Sorry about how long this took! Anyway, finally got to testing it
Reviewed-by: Lyude
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 14:37 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> With the previous code we were only recomputing the DDB partitioning
> for the CRTCs included in the atomic commit, so any other active
> CRTCs
> would en
Op 04-10-16 om 19:44 schreef Paulo Zanoni:
> Em Ter, 2016-10-04 às 14:37 -0300, Paulo Zanoni escreveu:
>> With the previous code we were only recomputing the DDB partitioning
>> for the CRTCs included in the atomic commit, so any other active
>> CRTCs
>> would end up having their DDB registers zero
Em Ter, 2016-10-04 às 14:37 -0300, Paulo Zanoni escreveu:
> With the previous code we were only recomputing the DDB partitioning
> for the CRTCs included in the atomic commit, so any other active
> CRTCs
> would end up having their DDB registers zeroed. In this patch we make
> sure that the compute
With the previous code we were only recomputing the DDB partitioning
for the CRTCs included in the atomic commit, so any other active CRTCs
would end up having their DDB registers zeroed. In this patch we make
sure that the computed state starts as a copy of the current
partitioning, and then we on
