On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:50:20AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 28-06-16 om 01:42 schreef Matt Roper:
> > When a display update triggers a DDB re-allocation, we should start by
> > assuming that only the updated pipes need to be re-allocated (we have
> > logic later that may add additional
Op 28-06-16 om 01:42 schreef Matt Roper:
> When a display update triggers a DDB re-allocation, we should start by
> assuming that only the updated pipes need to be re-allocated (we have
> logic later that may add additional pipes if, e.g., a modeset triggers a
> change to the global allocation).
>
When a display update triggers a DDB re-allocation, we should start by
assuming that only the updated pipes need to be re-allocated (we have
logic later that may add additional pipes if, e.g., a modeset triggers a
change to the global allocation).
We were erroneously using the _active_ pipes as ou
