Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan
On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 10:38 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC can
> really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
> underruns were harmless error messages, enabling FB
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:38:57AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC can
> really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
> underruns were harmless error messages, enabling FBC would cause the
> underruns to give black sc
Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC can
really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
underruns were harmless error messages, enabling FBC would cause the
underruns to give black screens.
We recently tried to enable FBC on Haswell and got reports of
Em Seg, 2016-09-12 às 21:25 +0100, Chris Wilson escreveu:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:02:56PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC
> > can
> > really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
> > underruns were harmles
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:02:56PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC can
> really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
> underruns were harmless error messages, enabling FBC would cause the
> underruns to give black sc
Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC can
really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
underruns were harmless error messages, enabling FBC would cause the
underruns to give black screens.
We recently tried to enable FBC on Haswell and got reports of
Em Sex, 2016-09-02 às 05:58 +, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran escreveu:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 19:36 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC
> > can
> > really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
> > underruns were harmle
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 19:36 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC can
> really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
> underruns were harmless error messages, enabling FBC would cause the
> underruns to give black screens.
Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC can
really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
underruns were harmless error messages, enabling FBC would cause the
underruns to give black screens.
We recently tried to enable FBC on Haswell and got reports of
On Jun 13 Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> Em Seg, 2016-06-13 às 13:47 +0200, Stefan Richter escreveu:
> > On Jun 10 Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > >
> > > Since my test machines don't produce FIFO underrun errors, I tested
> > > this by
> > > creating a debugfs file that just calls
> > > intel_fbc_handle_fifo
Em Seg, 2016-06-13 às 13:47 +0200, Stefan Richter escreveu:
> On Jun 10 Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > Since my test machines don't produce FIFO underrun errors, I tested
> > this by
> > creating a debugfs file that just calls
> > intel_fbc_handle_fifo_underrun(). I'd
> > appreciate some Tested-by ta
On Jun 10 Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Since my test machines don't produce FIFO underrun errors, I tested this by
> creating a debugfs file that just calls intel_fbc_handle_fifo_underrun(). I'd
> appreciate some Tested-by tags, if possible.
Since May 8 I have been using 4.6.0-rc6 patched with
drm-intel-
Ever since I started working on FBC I was already aware that FBC can
really amplify the FIFO underrun symptoms. On systems where FIFO
underruns were harmless error messages, enabling FBC would cause the
underruns to give black screens.
We recently tried to enable FBC on Haswell and got reports of
13 matches
Mail list logo
