Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL

2022-09-30 Thread Matthew Auld
On 30/09/2022 14:32, Tejas Upadhyay wrote: Add these extra EHL entries back since we have drm-tip commit 13d29c823738 ("drm/i915/ehl: unconditionally flush the pages on acquire") introduces proper flushing to make it work as expected. Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Matthew Auld Fixes: 046091758b50 ("Rev

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL

2022-09-30 Thread Tejas Upadhyay
Add these extra EHL entries back since we have drm-tip commit 13d29c823738 ("drm/i915/ehl: unconditionally flush the pages on acquire") introduces proper flushing to make it work as expected. Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Matthew Auld Fixes: 046091758b50 ("Revert "drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL"

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL

2021-06-14 Thread Tejas Upadhyay
From: Matt Roper These extra EHL entries were not behaving as expected without proper flushing implemented in kernel. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/commit/?id=a679f58d051025db6fa86226c4d35650b75e990f patch introduces proper flushing to make it work as expected. Hence adding those EHL entr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL

2019-06-15 Thread Matt Roper
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:27:04PM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 16:40 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > EHL defines two new MOCS table entries but is otherwise compatible > > with > > the ICL MOCS table. > > > > These table entries (16 and 17) should still be considered unused for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL

2019-06-13 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 16:40 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > EHL defines two new MOCS table entries but is otherwise compatible > with > the ICL MOCS table. > > These table entries (16 and 17) should still be considered unused for > ICL and as such their behavior remains undefined for that platform. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL

2019-06-06 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:40 PM Matt Roper wrote: > > EHL defines two new MOCS table entries but is otherwise compatible with > the ICL MOCS table. > > These table entries (16 and 17) should still be considered unused for > ICL and as such their behavior remains undefined for that platform. > > Si

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Update MOCS table for EHL

2019-05-30 Thread Matt Roper
EHL defines two new MOCS table entries but is otherwise compatible with the ICL MOCS table. These table entries (16 and 17) should still be considered unused for ICL and as such their behavior remains undefined for that platform. Signed-off-by: Matt Roper --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.