ember 02, 2014 5:27 PM
To: Runyan, Arthur J; Daniel Vetter
Cc: Jani Nikula; Ville Syrjälä; Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
On 08/27/2014 01:54 PM, Runyan, Arthur J wrote:
> :-) We pulled most of th
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:12:25PM +, Runyan, Arthur J wrote:
I'll check it out. I haven't heard any complaint about this before, but
it may be one of those thin
On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:52 AM
To: Runyan, Arthur J
Cc: Jani Nikula; Taylor, Clinton A; Ville Syrjälä;
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:12:25PM +
To: Taylor, Clinton A; Ville Syrjälä; Runyan, Arthur J
> Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
> Enable assert
>
>
> +Art
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Clint Taylor wrote:
> > There is also
r, Clinton A; Ville Syrjälä; Runyan, Arthur J
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Backlight PWM enable before BL
Enable assert
+Art
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Clint Taylor wrote:
> There is also a need to add this delay when turning off the PWM
+Art
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Clint Taylor wrote:
> There is also a need to add this delay when turning off the PWM enable
> bit through intel_panel_disable_backlight(). If the PWM enable bit is
> turned off while the PWM signal is high then the signal remains high. If
> the bit is turned off whe
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:23:43AM -0700, Clint Taylor wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 04:23 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:48:35PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
> >> From: Clint Taylor
> >>
> >> Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
> >> backlight e
On 08/20/2014 04:23 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:48:35PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
From: Clint Taylor
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
from VDD enable which occur sever
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:48:35PM -0700, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Clint Taylor
>
> Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
> backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
> from VDD enable which occur several seconds before resulting
> in PWM s
From: Clint Taylor
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
from VDD enable which occur several seconds before resulting
in PWM starting 5ms after backlight enable. Changes to backlight
duty cycle take affect at the
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Clint Taylor
>
> Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
> backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
> from VDD enable which occur several seconds before resulting
> in PWM starting 5ms after back
From: Clint Taylor
Backlight on delay uses PWM enable time to seperate PWM to
backlight enable assert. Previous time difference used timing
from VDD enable which occur several seconds before resulting
in PWM starting 5ms after backlight enable. Changes to backlight
duty cycle take affect at the
12 matches
Mail list logo
