On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:42:57AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> so this is not a "fix". But let's simplify this math
> so poor brains like mine can read and make some sense of
> it in the future.
>
> v2: Don't follow the spec since th
I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
so this is not a "fix". But let's simplify this math
so poor brains like mine can read and make some sense of
it in the future.
v2: Don't follow the spec since that gives invalid
values and it is also confusing. This Ville's
ver
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:51:26PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
> so this is not a "fix". But let's simplify this math
> so poor brains like mine can read and make some sense of
> it in the future.
>
> v2: Don't follow the spec since th
I confess I never fully understood that previous calculation,
so this is not a "fix". But let's simplify this math
so poor brains like mine can read and make some sense of
it in the future.
v2: Don't follow the spec since that gives invalid
values and it is also confusing. This Ville's
ver
