Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Only use 2g GGTT for 32b platforms

2014-05-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:46:57PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > From: Ben Widawsky > > Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this > is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We could > potentially add a patch to bump it to 3GB on top of this one. > > T

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Only use 2g GGTT for 32b platforms

2014-05-20 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:46:57PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > From: Ben Widawsky > > Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this > is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We could > potentially add a patch to bump it to 3GB on top of this one. > > T

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Only use 2g GGTT for 32b platforms

2014-05-19 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
From: Ben Widawsky Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We could potentially add a patch to bump it to 3GB on top of this one. This probably should be CC: stable - but I'll let the powers that be decide t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Only use 2g GGTT for 32b platforms

2014-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:25:42AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 08 May 2014, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:42:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> Aside: Please add the regression tags when handling bugs, I need those for > >> tracking and stats. > >> -Daniel > >> > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Only use 2g GGTT for 32b platforms

2014-05-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 08 May 2014, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:42:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Aside: Please add the regression tags when handling bugs, I need those for >> tracking and stats. >> -Daniel >> > > I don't know what a regression tag is. "[regression]" at the front of t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Only use 2g GGTT for 32b platforms

2014-05-07 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:42:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:58:59PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > From: Ben Widawsky > > > > Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this > > is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We cou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Only use 2g GGTT for 32b platforms

2014-05-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:58:59PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > From: Ben Widawsky > > Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this > is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We could > potentially add a patch to bump it to 3GB on top of this one. > > T

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Only use 2g GGTT for 32b platforms

2014-05-06 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Ben Widawsky Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We could potentially add a patch to bump it to 3GB on top of this one. This probably should be CC: stable - but I'll let the powers that be decide t