On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Woodhouse, David
wrote:
> I think I have found this problem on the IOMMU side. We usually assume
> that RMRRs are for boot-time only, such as USB controllers for the
> legacy keyboard/mouse emulation. And a patch sneaked in which
> effectively *unmaps* the RMRR reg
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 16:17 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Can't tell though, because my machine is still dying in an endless
> stream of
> [ 199.647850] [drm:intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting] *ERROR*
> Interrupt arrived before CRTCs were setup up
Except when the failure mode is differen
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 23:10 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> I've asked you on private irc whether this range matches/overlaps with
> stolen - we know of things blowing up at least on earlier generations
> in combination with dmar. Please boot with drm.debug=0xe and scan for
> the stolen mem report
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:14:05PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:40:30PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:58:06AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > The preliminary HW support check is no longer needed, and the
> > > calculation is simplified while
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Woodhouse, David
wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 12:14 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>>
>> This was based off of linus master, since I assumed that is what David
>> was using.
>
> Indeed. Now it's much better. Now that nasty scary warning is gone away
> and now I just
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 12:14 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
> This was based off of linus master, since I assumed that is what David
> was using.
Indeed. Now it's much better. Now that nasty scary warning is gone away
and now I just have a few hundred of these (from your other patch before
which it
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> This was based off of linus master, since I assumed that is what David
> was using. Honestly, I hadn't looked at our Intel trees. Maybe we're
> good here already.
Ok, now I was even more confused ... Turns out this was part of
"drm/i915/bdw:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:40:30PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:58:06AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > The preliminary HW support check is no longer needed, and the
> > calculation is simplified while here.
> >
> > Reported-by: David Woodhouse
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Wi
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:58:06AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The preliminary HW support check is no longer needed, and the
> calculation is simplified while here.
>
> Reported-by: David Woodhouse
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 9 +
> 1 fil
The preliminary HW support check is no longer needed, and the
calculation is simplified while here.
Reported-by: David Woodhouse
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i
10 matches
Mail list logo
