Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v4.

2016-05-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:07:57AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 04/05/16 13:38, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks > >vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought > >nobody relied on the behavior, but u

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v4.

2016-05-05 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 04/05/16 13:38, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are exceptions. drm_framebuffer_remove may fai

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/core: Do not preserve framebuffer on rmfb, v4.

2016-05-04 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
It turns out that preserving framebuffers after the rmfb call breaks vmwgfx userspace. This was originally introduced because it was thought nobody relied on the behavior, but unfortunately it seems there are exceptions. drm_framebuffer_remove may fail with -EINTR now, so a straight revert is impo