Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: Fix outdated comment.

2017-01-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 11:22:54AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Op 15-12-16 om 16:19 schreef Daniel Vetter: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > >> drm_atomic_state_put is called unconditi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: Fix outdated comment.

2017-01-04 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 15-12-16 om 16:19 schreef Daniel Vetter: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> drm_atomic_state_put is called unconditionally, so TEST_ONLY is no > >> different from commit. > >> > >> Signe

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: Fix outdated comment.

2017-01-04 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 15-12-16 om 16:19 schreef Daniel Vetter: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:29:42PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> drm_atomic_state_put is called unconditionally, so TEST_ONLY is no >> different from commit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst > I think it'd be good to update the kerneldoc for