Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Update generation checks to provide basic support for Ivybridge.

2012-02-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 12:05:05PM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > There may be some updates required, but assuming Ivybridge is similar to > Sandybridge is a decent start; previously it fell through to the Gen2/3 > case and nothing worked. > > Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke intel_reg_read/write

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Update generation checks to provide basic support for Ivybridge.

2012-02-08 Thread Ben Widawsky
On 02/08/2012 09:05 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > There may be some updates required, but assuming Ivybridge is similar to > Sandybridge is a decent start; previously it fell through to the Gen2/3 > case and nothing worked. I didn't think anyone actually used this register map... so I never bothere

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Update generation checks to provide basic support for Ivybridge.

2012-02-08 Thread Kenneth Graunke
There may be some updates required, but assuming Ivybridge is similar to Sandybridge is a decent start; previously it fell through to the Gen2/3 case and nothing worked. Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke --- lib/intel_reg_map.c |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --