On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 07:14:01PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > This reverts commit 5a0afd4b78ec23f27f5d486ac3d102c2e8d66bd7.
> >
> > Although timeout mode allows higher residency it impact badly on
> > performance.
> > I believe while we don't have a w
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This reverts commit 5a0afd4b78ec23f27f5d486ac3d102c2e8d66bd7.
>
> Although timeout mode allows higher residency it impact badly on performance.
> I believe while we don't have a way to balance between performance and
> power savings at runtime I believe w
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:14:31AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This reverts commit 5a0afd4b78ec23f27f5d486ac3d102c2e8d66bd7.
>
> Although timeout mode allows higher residency it impact badly on performance.
> I believe while we don't have a way to balance between performance and
We do though. We
This reverts commit 5a0afd4b78ec23f27f5d486ac3d102c2e8d66bd7.
Although timeout mode allows higher residency it impact badly on performance.
I believe while we don't have a way to balance between performance and
power savings at runtime I believe we have to revert and prioritize
performance that wa
