Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-20 Thread Glen Gray
On 19 Jan 2012, at 17:25, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:22:56PM +, Glen Gray wrote: >> >> On 18 Jan 2012, at 12:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-19 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 15:25, Daniel Vetter wrote: > These discussions are about the i81x, _not_ any later gen2 device. Afaics > I'm about the only serious user of that stuff left > If we consider Phoronix feedback and comments [1], the i81x ones are still by far more popular than all the other

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-19 Thread Glen Gray
On 18 Jan 2012, at 12:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone >>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:22:56PM +, Glen Gray wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2012, at 12:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-18 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On 01/18/2012 06:36 AM, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: Wasn't DRI1 ripped from mesa as well? Yes it was, though theoretically you can still build DRI1 drivers from 7.11 and load them with 8.0. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http:/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-18 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Danie

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone > > > wrote: > > > > Does what it says on the box. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone > > wrote: > > > Does what it says on the box. > > > > Danvet can you please test this on your elderly i810 box and make

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Does what it says on the box. > > Danvet can you please test this on your elderly i810 box and make sure > we don't accidentally open the can of worms. Any sign of regressio

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:51 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > Does what it says on the box. Danvet can you please test this on your elderly i810 box and make sure we don't accidentally open the can of worms. Any sign of regressions? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre __

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make XAA support optional

2012-01-17 Thread Daniel Stone
Does what it says on the box. Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone --- configure.ac | 14 ++ src/legacy/i810/Makefile.am |6 +- src/legacy/i810/i810.h|4 src/legacy/i810/i810_dga.c|2 ++ src/legacy/i810/i810_driver.c | 10 +- src