Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Graphics corruption issues

2010-04-25 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 18:52 -0400, Alexander Lam wrote: > It is usually preferred to post patches inline or else nobody will > look at them ;D. FWIW, we're actually pretty awful at patch triage in gEDA (the project I work on).. there are patches languishing in the bug tracker, and in various peop

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Graphics corruption issues

2010-04-25 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 18:54 -0400, Alexander Lam wrote: > Oh my bad. *facepalm* > I didn't see that you had already posted them inline. They were attached, with a suggested viewing hint of inline - so I think your original comment was correct. I'm not familiar with how to send mails straight from

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Graphics corruption issues

2010-04-22 Thread Peter Clifton
Here is a patch for some graphics corruption issues I discovered since this commit: commit 1cc2c2c44ac72460cf1c4e6bdc13c612235809c9 Author: Chris Wilson Date: Wed Apr 14 11:18:25 2010 +0100 i830: Use pixman_blt directly for performing the in-memory copy In order to avoid an infini