On Tue, 13 May 2014 10:41:58 +0300
Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2014, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this
> > is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We could
> > potentially add a patch to bump it to 3GB on top
On Thu, 08 May 2014, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this
> is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We could
> potentially add a patch to bump it to 3GB on top of this one.
>
> This probably should be CC: stable - but I'll l
Daniel requested in the bug that I use a 3GB fallback size. Since this
is not in the spec as a valid size, I decided against it. We could
potentially add a patch to bump it to 3GB on top of this one.
This probably should be CC: stable - but I'll let the powers that be
decide that one.
Regression