v6 is fine to me as well, RB on it to go ahead.
Out of curious, why " [PATCH v11 01/10] " is on subject?
-David
-Original Message-
From: Lionel Landwerlin
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 10:33 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin ; Zhou, Davi
ot; ,"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" ,Eric
Anholt ,DRI-Devel
[CAUTION: External Email]
We would like to get both the fence & the syncobj in i915 rather than
doing 2 calls to drm_syncobj_find() & drm_syncobj_find_fence().
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin
Cc: Christian Koenig
Cc: Da
lready add test case to igt, and tested by many existing test, like
libdrm unit test, igt related test, vulkan cts, and steam games.
-David
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:15 PM
> To: Koenig, Christian
> Cc: Zhou, D
Hi Daniel and Chris,
Could you take a look on all the patches? Can we get your RB or AB on all
patches including igt patch before we submit to drm-misc?
We already fix all existing issues, and also add test case in IGT as your
required.
Btw, the patch set is tested by below tests:
a. vulkan
Make igt for cross-driver, I think you should rename it first, not an intel
specific. NO company wants their employee working on other company stuff.
You can rename it to DGT(drm graphics test), and published following libdrm,
or directly merge to libdrm, then everyone can use it and develop it
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou
> -Original Message-
> From: Julia Lawall
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 2:57 AM
> To: Zhou, David(ChunMing)
> Cc: kbuild-...@01.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Christian König
> ; Gustav
