Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: intel_overlay_print_error_state() only needed for debugfs (v2)

2010-08-26 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2010, um 08:41:13 schrieb Andre Müller: > On 08/26/10 01:52, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > > The function intel_overlay_print_error_state() is called from within > > i915_error_state() in i915_debufs.c which is only built if > > CONFIG_DEBUG_FS

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: intel_overlay_print_error_state() only needed for debugfs (v2)

2010-08-25 Thread Tobias Doerffel
is superfluous in this case. Therefore only build it if CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is set. Signed-off-by: Tobias Doerffel --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: intel_overlay_print_error_state() only needed for debugfs

2010-08-25 Thread Tobias Doerffel
The function intel_overlay_print_error_state() is called from within i915_error_state() in i915_debufs.c which is only built if CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is set. When building without this option, seq_printf() is not declared in intel_overlay.c and the file fails to compile. Furthermore the whole function is

Re: [Intel-gfx] Extreme memory usage when running USDX with Intel driver

2010-05-04 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, Am Dienstag, 4. Mai 2010, um 03:24:56 schrieb Eric Anholt: > Your note about glyphs is interesting, and may be useful. Right now we > tile any texture that comes our way. If the app is generating many tiny > textures for glyphs, the tiling may increase the pitch by up to a factor > of 8. Yo

[Intel-gfx] Extreme memory usage when running USDX with Intel driver

2010-05-03 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, I have serious problems with running UltraStar Deluxe (a free OpenGL-based karaoke program) on an Intel graphic card (945GME). When starting the program, the system starts to use more than 1,5 GB of RAM for (I guess) GEM stuff. I can't blame the program as it's running fine with both swrast (

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Attempt to re-enable FBC on gen3

2010-04-29 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Hi, Am Freitag, 23. April 2010, um 17:17:38 schrieb Adam Jackson: > Disclaimer: I haven't tested this extensively, it just seems logical, and I > really hate to see us lose FBC on gen3 since that's the family being used > in low-wattage devices. Wider testing would be greatly appreciated. Works r