Re: [Intel-gfx] Possible regression in drm/i915 driver: memleak

+Added DRM mailing list and maintainers On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 15:33 +0100, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been unsuccessful to find any particular Intel i915 maintainer > emails, so my best bet is to post here, as you will must assuredly > already know them. > > The problem is a k

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2 5/13] hid: use time_is_after_jiffies() instead of jiffies judgment

On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 18:30 -0800, Qing Wang wrote: > From: Wang Qing > > It is better to use time_xxx() directly instead of jiffies judgment > for understanding. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada > --- >  drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] GPU-bound energy efficiency improvements for the intel_pstate driver.

On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 15:03 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > I have to ask, if this is all just to work around iowait triggering > high > frequencies for GPU bound applications, does it all just boil down to > i915 incorrectly using iowait. Does this patch set perform better > than > > diff --git a/dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] GPU-bound energy efficiency improvements for the intel_pstate driver.

On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 17:04 +0300, Eero Tamminen wrote: > Hi, > > On 14.04.2018 07:01, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > Hi Francisco, > > > > [...] > > > > > Are you no longer interested in improving those aspects of the > > > non- > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] GPU-bound energy efficiency improvements for the intel_pstate driver.

Hi Francisco, [...] > Are you no longer interested in improving those aspects of the non- > HWP > governor?  Is it that you're planning to delete it and move back to a > generic cpufreq governor for non-HWP platforms in the near future? Yes that is the plan for Atom platforms, which are only non

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] GPU-bound energy efficiency improvements for the intel_pstate driver.

On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 09:26 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote: > > "just like" here is possibly somewhat unfair to the schedutil > governor, > admittedly its progressive IOWAIT boosting behavior seems somewhat > less > wasteful than the intel_pstate non-HWP governor's IOWAIT boosting > behavior, but it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] GPU-bound energy efficiency improvements for the intel_pstate driver.

On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 15:28 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote: > Francisco Jerez writes: > [...] > For the case anyone is wondering what's going on, Srinivas pointed me > at > a larger idle power usage increase off-list, ultimately caused by the > low-latency heuristic as discussed in the paragraph

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Quirk to ignore VBT bpp

es and commit af13188a1a6623fc8b4b6c42178046fb80f8b1d0 Author: Daniel Vetter Date: Tue Feb 19 17:45:00 2013 +0100 drm/i915: force bpp for eDP panels Reported-by: Srinivas Pandruvada CC: Adam Jackson CC: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel