Re: [Intel-gfx] suggestions for Web site (was: Intel 2011Q1 release)

2011-04-19 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
Hi, my dell Latitude E6410 with an arrandale http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrandale seems to be a Intel® HD Graphics , is eligible for use vaapi ? On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 09:56 +0800, Lan, Hai wrote: > Dear Paul, > Thanks for your suggestion. http://intellinuxgraphics.org/vaapi.html has been

[Intel-gfx] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung

2011-01-11 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
Hi, I have fedora 14 updated with kernel 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.x86_64 and after open lid , sometimes I got this errors: Where I can find out a bug report similar to this [157190.344037] [drm:i915_do_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_do_wait_request returns -5 (awaiting 562457 at 560424) [157190.842188] [d

Re: [Intel-gfx] how get drm-intel-next into a stable kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 12:47 -0700, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > So now it's just the suspend issue. Same behavior as 2.6.34: > when resuming, the display is off, and switching VTs, etc., won't > turn > it on. What does work, if I type very carefully, is hibernating and > then > resuming. Sus

[Intel-gfx] how get drm-intel-next into a stable kernel

2010-08-05 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
Hi, Have some kind of howto doc ?, about merging, testing os using drm-intel-next with a stable kernel, lets say kernel-2.6.35. Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@li

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: be sure panel is powered up in eDP configs

2010-07-21 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
Hi!, so what is the state of this ? From: Adam Jackson To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/dp: Rename has_edp to is_pch_edp to reflect its real meaning Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:46:27 -0400 (07/16/2010 07:46:27 PM) seems that have something related to t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-15 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 18:31 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 18:16:23 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:18 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-15 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:18 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > > New requirements compared to 2.10 > > - > > * Libdrm >= 2.4.19 > > > The requirement is actually 2.4.21, afaict. and libdrm >= 2.4.21 requi

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-06 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 10:47 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > > > xorg-x11-drv-intel > n require kernel > n and libdrm > n . > > What does that "n" mean? I don't understand that sentence. n is a number > > So the order should be: > > 1st kernel > > 2nd libdrm > > 3 mesa. > > 4 Xserver > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-05 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 15:59 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Wednesday May 5 2010 03:31:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > If you use intel-drv shipped on distros, should have problems , do you > > use ubuntu ? > > > > Intel-drv? Don't have such a packa

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-04 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
2.6.33.3-72.fc13.i686 > xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.11.0-3.fc13.i686 > made 2D works quick enough. > > I can confirm - there was big improvement. > > Thanks. > > --- On Wed, 5/5/10, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > From: Sergio Monteiro Basto > > Subject:

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-04 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 21:48 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Friday April 30 2010 22:56:12 Clemens Eisserer wrote: > > And although so much has changed, I still > > - Can't scroll through my gmail inbox "fluently", not with firefox > > nore with Opera > > - Can't play even simple OpenGL games

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression

2010-05-01 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 22:56 +0200, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > > Oh, I get it. You don't understand software. > > Well although the whole discussion isn't really focussed, he has one point. > The overall desktop experience is way better on the old terminals > running Fedora-7 (intel-2.2 / XAA) tha

Re: [Intel-gfx] BACKLIGHT_CONTROL and xrandr

2010-04-15 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 23:02 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:57:51PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > So any change this patch enter in fedora kernel ? or have this patch > > against fedora kernels ? > > It's unlikely to end up in a

Re: [Intel-gfx] BACKLIGHT_CONTROL and xrandr

2010-04-12 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 21:46 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:45:11PM +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 18:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] BACKLIGHT_CONTROL and xrandr

2010-04-12 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 18:36 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 06:19:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Can you give this patch a try? It's not ready for upstream yet, but > > ought to work. > > It would, of course, be more useful if I included the patch. Hum can't appl