Re: [Intel-gfx] Fwd: 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-11-02 Thread Seblu
This seems to be fixed in 2.6.37-rc1 and lastest git tree. :) Thanks guys! On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Seblu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:19:50 +0200, Seblu wrote: >>> Hello Chris, >>> >>&

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fwd: 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-26 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:19:50 +0200, Seblu wrote: >> Hello Chris, >> >> i've tryed last git kernel with edp-fixes from >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jbarnes/drm-intel.git, >&g

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fwd: 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-25 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Peter Clifton wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:57 +0200, Seblu wrote: >> I make an another video, which show suspend to ram issue with this >> lastest kernel and how it's perfectly functionnal with 2.6.35.7. >> >> http://videobin

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fwd: 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-25 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Peter Clifton wrote: > For future reference.. its probably not a good idea to let that > condition persist. There is a chance it might damage the LCD if it is > powered but not being driven properly. ok > Do you have this commit from drm-next recently?: > > commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fwd: 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-25 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:44:18 +0200, Seblu wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> >> Did you receive my previous mail about 2.6.36-rc2 issue, do you thinks >> this can be fix before 2.6.36 release ? >> Do you need more invest

Re: [Intel-gfx] Fwd: 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-18 Thread Seblu
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:44:18 +0200, Seblu wrote: > That bisection result is very bizarre. In a midst of a major timing mishap > in rc2, that commit is comparatively calm and at least prints out an error > message should you ever

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-10 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Seblu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Seblu wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Zhenyu Wang wrote: >>> On 2010.10.01 22:27:45 +0200, Seblu wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Chris Wilson >>>>

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-09 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Seblu wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Zhenyu Wang wrote: >> On 2010.10.01 22:27:45 +0200, Seblu wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: >>> > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:55:56 + (UTC), Seb

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-07 Thread Seblu
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > On 2010.10.01 22:27:45 +0200, Seblu wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:55:56 + (UTC), Seblu wrote: >> >> I've the same kind trouble with

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-01 Thread Seblu
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:55:56 + (UTC), Seblu wrote: >> I've the same kind trouble with -rc6 and my dell e6410. When module i915 is >> loaded screen become black and i loose the hand on the system. > > Nope, com

Re: [Intel-gfx] 2.6.36-rc5 i915 regression

2010-10-01 Thread Seblu
Chris Wilson chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:00:05 +0200, Johannes Hirte fem.tu- ilmenau.de> wrote: > > With 2.6.36-rc5 and later my netbook is unusable. After login on X (KDE) the > > screen gets totally garbled, under X and console too. The log shows me this > > messages