Daniel Vetter writes:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Jani Nikula writes:
>>> This is a generic version of Daniel's patch [1] letting us have unsafe
>>> module parameters (experimental, debugging, testing, etc.) that taint
>>
types (eg. int and bool). So for the moment I prefer a more
naive approach.
Does this work for you?
Subject: module: add taint_int type
An int parameter which taints the kernel if set; i915 at least wants this.
Based-on-patches-by: Daniel Vetter
Based-on-patches-by: Jani Nikula
Signed-of
Daniel Vetter writes:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:19:54AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Daniel Vetter writes:
>> > Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
>> > all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports bec
Daniel Vetter writes:
> Users just love to set random piles of options since surely enabling
> all the experimental stuff helps. Later on we get bug reports because
> it all fell apart.
>
> Even more fun when it's labelled a regression when some change only
> just made the feature possible (e.g. s
