On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:14:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> I've just tracked down and fixed an bug which can lead to a hard-hang
> in the crtc restore code (which is used both in the lid handler when
> opening and on resume). If you could please test this patch (on top of
> drm-intel-night
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:14:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> I've just tracked down and fixed an bug which can lead to a hard-hang
> in the crtc restore code (which is used both in the lid handler when
> opening and on resume). If you could please test this patch (on top of
> drm-intel-night
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:03:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> That patch should crash at all, so this is not expected. Can you pls
> check whether plain drm-intel-nightly is broken, too?
I did try drm-intel-nightly just now (1dd83e3), and it also freezes
the machine. I first verified that the
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:07:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> It's written against drm-intel-next-queued at
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel
>
> I've thought that it should apply pretty cleanly against older kernels,
> too. Apparently it conflicts a bit in intel_modeset_set
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:51:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It will be only consistent once we've restored all the crtcs. Since a
> bunch of other callers also want to just restore a single crtc, add a
> boolean to disable checking only where it doesn't make sense.
>
> Note that intel_modeset
