Re: Linux 6.10-rc1

2024-07-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Ok, so machine is ready to be thrown out of window, again. Trying to > > play 29C3 video should not make machine completely unusable ... as in > > keyboard looses keystrokes in terminal. > > Well, that at least sounds like you can bisect it with a very clear test-case? > > Even if you do

Re: Linux 6.10-rc1

2024-06-19 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Let's bring in the actual gpu people.. Dave/Jani/others - does any of > > > this sound familiar? Pavel says things have gotten much slower in > > > 6.10: "something was very wrong with the performance, likely to do > > > with graphics" > > > > Actually, maybe it's not graphics at all. R

Re: Linux 6.10-rc1

2024-06-17 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Let's bring in the actual gpu people.. Dave/Jani/others - does any of > > this sound familiar? Pavel says things have gotten much slower in > > 6.10: "something was very wrong with the performance, likely to do > > with graphics" > > Actually, maybe it's not graphics at all. Rafael just s

Re: Linux 6.10-rc1

2024-06-14 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Let's bring in the actual gpu people.. Dave/Jani/others - does any of > > this sound familiar? Pavel says things have gotten much slower in > > 6.10: "something was very wrong with the performance, likely to do > > with graphics" > > Actually, maybe it's not graphics at all. Rafael just s

Re: Linux 6.10-rc1

2024-06-14 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Let's bring in the actual gpu people.. Dave/Jani/others - does any of > > this sound familiar? Pavel says things have gotten much slower in > > 6.10: "something was very wrong with the performance, likely to do > > with graphics" > > Actually, maybe it's not graphics at all. Rafael just s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] treewide: Convert del_timer*() to timer_shutdown*()

2022-12-20 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2022-12-20 13:45:19, Steven Rostedt wrote: > [ > Linus, > > I ran the script against your latest master branch: > commit b6bb9676f2165d518b35ba3bea5f1fcfc0d969bf > > As the timer_shutdown*() code is now in your tree, I figured > we can start doing the conversions. At leas

Re: [Intel-gfx] intel_mei_pxp: needs better help text

2021-10-17 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Extended Cc list. Should I attempt to prepare a patch? Best regards, Pavel On Thu 2021-10-14 12:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote: > > CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_PXP: > > MEI Support for PXP Services on Intel platforms. > > Enables

[Intel-gfx] intel_mei_pxp: needs better help text

2021-10-14 Thread Pavel Machek
CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_PXP: MEI Support for PXP Services on Intel platforms. Enables the ME FW services required for PXP support through I915 display driver of Intel. That's ... very useless help text. According to https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Intel-PXP-Protected-Xe-Path this

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.13-rc6 on thinkpad X220: graphics hangs with recent mainline

2021-08-17 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I'm getting graphics problems with 5.13-rc: > > > > Debian 10.9, X, chromium and flightgear is in use. Things were more > > stable than this with previous kernels. > > > > Any ideas? > > The error you are seeing: > > > [185300.784992] i915 :00:02.0: [drm] Resetting chip for stopped

[Intel-gfx] 5.13-rc6 on thinkpad X220: graphics hangs with recent mainline

2021-06-24 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I'm getting graphics problems with 5.13-rc: Debian 10.9, X, chromium and flightgear is in use. Things were more stable than this with previous kernels. Any ideas? Best regards, Pavel [185233.329693] wlp3s0: deauthenticated fro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 000/190] Revertion of all of the umn.edu commits

2021-04-29 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Revert "drm/radeon: Fix reference count leaks caused by > > pm_runtime_get_sync" > > Revert "drm/radeon: fix multiple reference count leak" > > Revert "drm/amdkfd: Fix reference count leaks." > > I didn't review these carefully, but from a quick look they all seem > rather incon

Re: [Intel-gfx] udldrm does not recover from powersave? Re: udldrmfb: causes WARN in i915 on X60 (x86-32)

2021-02-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > This is in -next, but I get same behaviour on 5.11; and no, udl does > > > > > > Thanks for reporting. We are in the process of fixing the issue. The > > > latest > > > patch is at [1]. > > > > > > > Thank you, that fixes the DMA issue, and I can use the udl. > > > > ...for a whil

Re: [Intel-gfx] udldrm does not recover from powersave? Re: udldrmfb: causes WARN in i915 on X60 (x86-32)

2021-02-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Thank you, that fixes the DMA issue, and I can use the udl. > > > > ...for a while. Then screensaver blanks laptop screen, udl screen > > blanks too. Upon hitting a key, internal screen shows up, udl does > > not. > > > > I try rerunning xrandr ... --auto, but could not recover it. > >

[Intel-gfx] udldrm does not recover from powersave? Re: udldrmfb: causes WARN in i915 on X60 (x86-32)

2021-02-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >This is in -next, but I get same behaviour on 5.11; and no, udl does > > Thanks for reporting. We are in the process of fixing the issue. The latest > patch is at [1]. > Thank you, that fixes the DMA issue, and I can use the udl. ...for a while. Then screensaver blanks laptop screen, udl

[Intel-gfx] udldrmfb: causes WARN in i915 on X60 (x86-32)

2021-02-24 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! This is in -next, but I get same behaviour on 5.11; and no, udl does not work, but monitor is detected: pavel@amd:~/g/tui/crashled$ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 4096 x 4096 LVDS1 connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 246mm x 185

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] kernel: Expose SYS_kcmp by default

2021-02-13 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Userspace has discovered the functionality offered by SYS_kcmp and has > started to depend upon it. In particular, Mesa uses SYS_kcmp for > os_same_file_description() in order to identify when two fd (e.g. device > or dmabuf) point to the same struct file. Since they depend on it for > core

[Intel-gfx] 4.19-stable: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Break up error capture compression loops with cond_resched()

2020-11-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > As the error capture will compress user buffers as directed to by the > user, it can take an arbitrary amount of time and space. Break up the > compression loops with a call to cond_resched(), that will allow other > processes to schedule (avoiding the soft lockups) and also serve as a > war

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

2020-09-09 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2020-09-01 13:57:55, Harald Arnesen wrote: > Still (rc3) doesn't work without the three reverts. > > I'm not sure how to proceed, I cannot capture any oops, and see nothing > obvious in any logs. I believe this is the place when you ask Linus for reverts... Best regards,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gem: Replace reloc chain with terminator on error unwind

2020-09-08 Thread Pavel Machek
I915_MAP_FORCE_WC); > + map = i915_gem_object_pin_map(pool->obj, I915_MAP_FORCE_WB); > > on top of the previous patch. Faultinjection didn't turn up anything in > eb_relocate_vma, so we need to dig deeper. With this on top of other patches, it works. Tested-by: Pav

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

2020-08-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >> It's a Thinkpad T520. > > > > Oh, so this is a 64-bit machine? Yeah, that patch to flush vmalloc > > ranges won't make any difference on x86-64. > > > > Or are you for some reason running a 32-bit kernel on that thing? Have > > you tried building a 64-bit one (user-space can be 32-bit,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] mm: Track page table modifications in __apply_to_page_range()

2020-08-23 Thread Pavel Machek
t; > Tested-by: Chris Wilson #x86-32 > Cc: # v5.8+ > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel This seems to solve screen blinking problems on Thinkpad X60. (It already survived few unison runs, which would usually kill it.). Tested-by: Pavel Machek

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] mm: Track page table modifications in __apply_to_page_range()

2020-08-22 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > The __apply_to_page_range() function is also used to change and/or > > > allocate page-table pages in the vmalloc area of the address space. > > > Make sure these changes get synchronized to other page-tables in the > > > system by calling arch_sync_kernel_mappings() when necessary. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] mm: Track page table modifications in __apply_to_page_range()

2020-08-21 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > The __apply_to_page_range() function is also used to change and/or > > > allocate page-table pages in the vmalloc area of the address space. > > > Make sure these changes get synchronized to other page-tables in the > > > system by calling arch_sync_kernel_mappings() when necessary. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

2020-08-21 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2020-08-20 09:16:18, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:23 AM Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Yes, it seems they make things work. (Chris asked for new patch to be > > tested, so I am switching to his kernel, but it survived longer than > > it usually

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

2020-08-20 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for > > other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit. > > Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work, because of > other changes. > > Reverting all of > >763fedd6a216 ("drm/i915: Remove i915_gem_objec

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

2020-08-19 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2020-08-18 18:59:27, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:13 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for > > other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit. > > Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work, b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gem: Replace reloc chain with terminator on error unwind

2020-08-19 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Yep, my machines are low on memory. > > > > But ... test did not work that well. I have dead X and blinking > > screen. Machine still works reasonably well over ssh, so I guess > > that's an improvement. > > > [ 7744.718473] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: f8c0 > > [ 77

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gem: Replace reloc chain with terminator on error unwind

2020-08-19 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > If we hit an error during construction of the reloc chain, we need to > > > replace the chain into the next batch with the terminator so that upon > > > flushing the relocations so far, we do not execute a hanging batch. > > > > Thanks for the patches. I assume this should fix problem f

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/gem: Replace reloc chain with terminator on error unwind

2020-08-19 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > If we hit an error during construction of the reloc chain, we need to > replace the chain into the next batch with the terminator so that upon > flushing the relocations so far, we do not execute a hanging batch. Thanks for the patches. I assume this should fix problem from "5.9-rc1: graphi

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

2020-08-19 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I think there's been some discussion about reverting that change for > > other reasons, but it's quite likely the culprit. > > Hmm. It reverts cleanly, but the end result doesn't work, because of > other changes. > > Reverting all of > >763fedd6a216 ("drm/i915: Remove i915_gem_objec

[Intel-gfx] 5.9-rc1: graphics regression moved from -next to mainline

2020-08-17 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! After about half an hour of uptime, screen starts blinking on thinkpad x60 and machine becomes unusable. I already reported this in -next, and now it is in mainline. It is 32-bit x86 system. Pavel Aug 17 17:36:04 amd ovpn-cas

[Intel-gfx] -next on 32-bit thinkpad x60: blinking screen, intel DRM responsible?

2020-08-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Next has been unusable for a while, but today I got dmesg. Screen is blinking, machine is very unhappy, and ssh is slow/hangs, but I got this: This is recurring patern, usually machine dies like this within 30 minutes of boot. [ 455.019838] perf: interrupt took too long (2509 > 2500), low

[Intel-gfx] thinkpad x60: oops in eb_relocate_dma in next-20200710

2020-07-11 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I attempted to suspend x60, but it did not work well... Machine is too messed up to pull more debug info from it :-(. Best regards, Pavel [11645.369495] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 5c:f4:ab:10:d2:bb (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=2) [1

Re: [Intel-gfx] v5.8-rc1 on thinkpad x220, intel graphics: interface frozen, can still switch to text console

2020-06-22 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2020-06-22 10:13:13, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Pavel Machek (2020-06-22 09:52:59) > > Hi! > > > > Linux duo 5.8.0-rc1+ #117 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jun 15 16:13:54 CEST 2020 x86_64 > > GNU/Linux > > > > [133747.719711] [ 17456] 0 17

[Intel-gfx] v5.8-rc1 on thinkpad x220, intel graphics: interface frozen, can still switch to text console

2020-06-22 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Linux duo 5.8.0-rc1+ #117 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jun 15 16:13:54 CEST 2020 x86_64 GNU/Linux [133747.719711] [ 17456] 0 17456 4166 271655360 0 sshd [133747.719718] [ 17466] 1000 17466 4166 289655360 0 sshd [133747.719724] [

[Intel-gfx] next-20200618: oops in eb_relocate_vma in Xorg process, making machine unusable

2020-06-18 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! On thinkpad X60 (x86-32): I got this: Had to reboot Best regards, Pavel Jun 18 23:16:28 amd kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: f860 Jun 18 23:16:28 amd kernel: #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode Jun 1

Re: [Intel-gfx] Linus, please revert 7dc8f11437: regression in 5.7-rc0, hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-11 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Beyond the fix already submitted? > > > > I did not get that one, can I have a pointer? > > What's the status of this one? I tried updating my kernel on April 3, that one did not work, but it did not include 721017cf4bd8. > I'm assuming the fix is commit 721017cf4bd8 ("drm/i915/gem: I

Re: [Intel-gfx] Linus, please revert 7dc8f11437: regression in 5.7-rc0, hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > 7dc8f1143778a35b190f9413f228b3cf28f67f8d > > > > > > drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath > > > > > > Since the relocations are no longer performed under a global > > > struct_mutex, or any other lock, that is also held by pagefault > > > handlers, > > > we can r

[Intel-gfx] Linus, please revert 7dc8f11437: regression in 5.7-rc0, hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-07 Thread Pavel Machek
On Fri 2020-04-03 15:00:31, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > 7dc8f1143778a35b190f9413f228b3cf28f67f8d > > drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath > > Since the relocations are no longer performed under a global > struct_mutex, or any other lock, that i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [bisected] Re: 7dc8f11437: regression in 5.7-rc0, hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-03 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! 7dc8f1143778a35b190f9413f228b3cf28f67f8d drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath Since the relocations are no longer performed under a global struct_mutex, or any other lock, that is also held by pagefault handlers, we can relax and allow our fast path to take a fault. As

[Intel-gfx] [bisected] Re: 5.7-rc0: regression caused by drm tree, hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-03 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > commit f365ab31efacb70bed1e821f7435626e0b2528a6 > > > Merge: 4646de87d325 59e7a8cc2dcf > > > Author: Linus Torvalds > > > Date: Wed Apr 1 15:24:20 2020 -0700 > > > > > > Merge tag 'drm-next-2020-04-01' of > > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm > > > > Any ideas, besides th

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.7-rc0: regression caused by drm tree, hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-03 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > commit f365ab31efacb70bed1e821f7435626e0b2528a6 > > Merge: 4646de87d325 59e7a8cc2dcf > > Author: Linus Torvalds > > Date: Wed Apr 1 15:24:20 2020 -0700 > > > > Merge tag 'drm-next-2020-04-01' of > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm > Any ideas, besides the b-word? > > Would

[Intel-gfx] 5.7-rc0: regression caused by drm tree, hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-03 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > Hardware is thinkpad x220. I had this crash few days ago. And today I > > > > have similar-looking one, with slightly newer kernel. (Will post > > > > as a follow-up). > > > > As part of quest for working system, I tried 5.7-rc0, based on > > > > Merge: 50a5de895dbe b4d8ddf8356d > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.7-rc0: hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-03 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Hardware is thinkpad x220. I had this crash few days ago. And today I > > > have similar-looking one, with slightly newer kernel. (Will post > > > as a follow-up). > > As part of quest for working system, I tried 5.7-rc0, based on > > Merge: 50a5de895dbe b4d8ddf8356d > Author: Linus To

[Intel-gfx] 5.7-rc0: hangs while attempting to run X

2020-04-03 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Hardware is thinkpad x220. I had this crash few days ago. And today I > > have similar-looking one, with slightly newer kernel. (Will post > > as a follow-up). As part of quest for working system, I tried 5.7-rc0, based on Merge: 50a5de895dbe b4d8ddf8356d Author: Linus Torvalds Date:

[Intel-gfx] 5.6-rc6: Xorg hangs

2020-04-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Hardware is thinkpad x220. I had this crash few days ago. And today I have similar-looking one, with slightly newer kernel. (Will post as a follow-up). Any idea what can be wrong? Pavel

[Intel-gfx] xorg hang in 5.5-rc1 -- use after free?

2019-12-23 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I got an X hang and there seems to be something useful in dmesg... Any ideas? Pavel [0.00] Linux version 5.5.0-rc1+ (pavel@amd) (gcc version 4.9.2 (Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u2)) #73 SMP PREEMPT Fri Dec 13 00:46:17 C

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Add support for integrated privacy screens

2019-10-24 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2019-10-22 17:12:06, Rajat Jain wrote: > Certain laptops now come with panels that have integrated privacy > screens on them. This patch adds support for such panels by adding > a privacy-screen property to the drm_connector for the panel, that > the userspace can then use to control and che

Re: DDC on Thinkpad x220

2019-10-01 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2019-10-01 12:39:34, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Thinkpad X220 should be new enough machine to talk DDC to the > > monitors, right? And my monitor has DDC enable/disable in the menu, so > > it should suppo

Re: 5.4-rc1 on Thinkpad x220: graphics regression, it "snows" on digital output

2019-10-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > When 5.4-rc1 is booted on thinkpad X220 I get "snow" and other > artefacts on digital output. > > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation > Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) > > It already snows when kernel is booting, snow continues

5.4-rc1 on Thinkpad x220: graphics regression, it "snows" on digital output

2019-10-01 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! When 5.4-rc1 is booted on thinkpad X220 I get "snow" and other artefacts on digital output. 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) It already snows when kernel is booting, snow continues in X. HDMI1 c

[Intel-gfx] DDC on Thinkpad x220

2019-09-30 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Thinkpad X220 should be new enough machine to talk DDC to the monitors, right? And my monitor has DDC enable/disable in the menu, so it should support it, too... But I don't have /dev/i2c* and did not figure out how to talk to the monitor. Is the support there in the kernel? What do I need to

Re: 5.2: display corruption on X60, X220

2019-06-06 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2019-06-06 11:32:18, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 03 Jun 2019, Pavel Machek wrote: > > In recent kernels (5.2.0-rc1-next-20190522, 5.2-rc2) I'm getting > > display corruption in X. Usually in terminals, but also in title bars > > etc. Black areas with wh

5.2: display corruption on X60, X220

2019-06-03 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! In recent kernels (5.2.0-rc1-next-20190522, 5.2-rc2) I'm getting display corruption in X. Usually in terminals, but also in title bars etc. Black areas with white lines in them, usually... Same configuration worked properly in ... probably 4.19? Then I got some graphics-crashes on X220 that p

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression from v4.19] Re: 4.20.0-rc6-next-20181210, v4.20-rc1: list_del corruption on thinkpad x220, graphics related?

2019-01-02 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > So if you could please try drm-tip reproducing AND open a bug in Bugzilla. > > > If you are unwilling to do that, it is very difficult to help you > > > more. > > > > Website says I have to read and agree to two different pieces of > > legalesee, and I'd need to keep track of yet anothe

[Intel-gfx] [regression from v4.19] Re: 4.20.0-rc6-next-20181210, v4.20-rc1: list_del corruption on thinkpad x220, graphics related?

2018-12-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > If you think it is useful, I can try to update my machine to > > > > linux-next. > > > > > > linux-next is closer to drm-tip, so it's better. Do you have some > > > specific reason for not wanting to run drm-tip (but linux-next is still > > > ok)? > > > > I already have build/update

[Intel-gfx] 4.20.0-rc6-next-20181210, v4.20-rc1: list_del corruption on thinkpad x220, graphics related?

2018-12-12 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > > > > There's one similar for nouveau in Bugzilla, but it seems like a > > > > > > > genuine > > > > > > > memory corruption (1 bit flipped): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84880 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any extra information would be of

[Intel-gfx] v4.20-rc5+ on x220: Resetting chip for hang on rcs0

2018-12-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Another day, another problem... but this one is different from the previous hang, as machine survives. Chromium was running with youtube video playing. [31850.666274] [drm] GPU hangs can indicate a bug anywhere in the entire gfx stack, including userspace. [31850.666277] [drm] Please file a

Re: [Intel-gfx] v4.20-rc1: list_del corruption on thinkpad x220, graphics related?

2018-12-08 Thread Pavel Machek
On Sat 2018-12-08 12:13:46, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > There's one similar for nouveau in Bugzilla, but it seems like a > > > > > genuine > > > > > memory corruption (1 bit flipped): > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] v4.20-rc1: list_del corruption on thinkpad x220, graphics related?

2018-12-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > There's one similar for nouveau in Bugzilla, but it seems like a genuine > > > > memory corruption (1 bit flipped): > > > > > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84880 > > > > > > > > Any extra information would be of use :) > > > > > > > > Regards, Joonas > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] v4.20-rc1: list_del corruption on thinkpad x220

2018-11-24 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > There's one similar for nouveau in Bugzilla, but it seems like a genuine > > > memory corruption (1 bit flipped): > > > > > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84880 > > > > > > Any extra information would be of use :) > > > > > > Regards, Joonas > > > > > > PS. Could you

Re: [Intel-gfx] v4.20-rc1: list_del corruption on thinkpad x220

2018-11-21 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > My machine locked hard (thinkpad x220). After reboot, I found this in > > syslog: > > > > Sounds like memory corruption..? Does not sound like easy to debug. > > Were you doing something GPU intense when you experienced the hard hang? > > And if so, have you been able to hit the issue m

[Intel-gfx] v4.20-rc1: list_del corruption on thinkpad x220

2018-11-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! My machine locked hard (thinkpad x220). After reboot, I found this in syslog: Sounds like memory corruption..? Does not sound like easy to debug. ...otoh, it still looks like an addres, so maybe it is "just" race in GPU drivers? Any ideas?

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/6] drm: Add Content Protection property

2017-12-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >> > Why would user of the machine want this to be something else than > >> > 'OFF'? > >> > > >> > If kernel implements this, will it mean hardware vendors will have to > >> > prevent user from updating kernel on machines they own? > >> > > >> > If this is merged, does it open kernel develop

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/6] drm: Add Content Protection property

2017-12-05 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2017-12-05 11:45:38, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:28:40AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2017-11-29 22:08:56, Sean Paul wrote: > > > This patch adds a new optional connector property to allow userspace to > > > enable > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 1/6] drm: Add Content Protection property

2017-12-05 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2017-11-29 22:08:56, Sean Paul wrote: > This patch adds a new optional connector property to allow userspace to enable > protection over the content it is displaying. This will typically be > implemented > by the driver using HDCP. > > The property is a tri-state with the following values:

Re: [Intel-gfx] GPU hang with kernel 4.10rc3

2017-05-11 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-01-23 10:39:27, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 13/01/17 15:41, Juergen Gross wrote: > > On 12/01/17 10:21, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:03:25AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > >>> On 11/01/17 18:08, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:33:34PM +0100, Jue

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] Re: 4.11-rc0, thinkpad x220: GPU hang

2017-04-09 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-03-06 12:23:41, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 01:10:48PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2017-03-06 11:15:28, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:01:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] Re: 4.11-rc0, thinkpad x220: GPU hang

2017-03-25 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-03-06 12:23:41, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 01:10:48PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2017-03-06 11:15:28, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:01:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] Re: 4.11-rc0, thinkpad x220: GPU hang

2017-03-21 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > > > mplayer stopped working after a while. Dmesg says: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 3000.266533] cdc_ether 2-1.2:1.0 usb0: register 'cdc_ether' at > > > > > > > > Now I'm pretty sure it is a regression in v4.11-rc0. Any ideas what to > > > > try? Bisect will be slow and nasty :-(. > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] Re: 4.11-rc0, thinkpad x220: GPU hang

2017-03-14 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2017-03-14 10:08:23, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 06.03.2017 00:01, Pavel Machek wrote: > >>> mplayer stopped working after a while. Dmesg says: > >>> > >>> [ 3000.266533] cdc_ether 2-1.2:1.0 usb0: register 'cdc_ether' at > > Now I&#

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] Re: 4.11-rc0, thinkpad x220: GPU hang

2017-03-06 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2017-03-06 11:15:28, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:01:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > mplayer stopped working after a while. Dmesg says: > > > > > > > > [ 3000.266533] cdc_ether 2-1.2:1.0 usb0: regi

[Intel-gfx] [regression] Re: 4.11-rc0, thinkpad x220: GPU hang

2017-03-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > mplayer stopped working after a while. Dmesg says: > > > > [ 3000.266533] cdc_ether 2-1.2:1.0 usb0: register 'cdc_ether' at Now I'm pretty sure it is a regression in v4.11-rc0. Any ideas what to try? Bisect will be slow and nasty :-(.

[Intel-gfx] 4.11-rc0, thinkpad x220: GPU hang

2017-02-28 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! mplayer stopped working after a while. Dmesg says: [ 3000.266533] cdc_ether 2-1.2:1.0 usb0: register 'cdc_ether' at usb-:00:1d.0-1.2, CDC Ethernet Device, 22:1b:e4:4e:56:f5 [ 3190.767227] [drm] GPU HANG: ecode 6:0:0xbb409fff, in chromium [4597], reason: Hang on render ring, action: reset

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

2016-12-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ] > > Hi, > > I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system > and I see some call-traces. > It is reproducible on suspend and resume. > > I cannot say which area touches the problem or if these are several > independent problems. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] v4.9-rc3: graphical artefacts in X

2016-11-25 Thread Pavel Machek
On Fri 2016-11-18 11:14:16, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:02:56PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > With v4.9, if I maximize "nowcast -x" application, I get broken > > display (as if someone split the window into rectangles an

[Intel-gfx] v4.9-rc3: graphical artefacts in X

2016-11-18 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! With v4.9, if I maximize "nowcast -x" application, I get broken display (as if someone split the window into rectangles and shuffled them a bit). Switching virtual desktops either fixes it or breaks it, depending in how fast I switch. (Yes, strange). pavel@amd:~$ lspci | grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume

2016-10-18 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! On Wed 2016-09-14 14:14:35, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> For the "sometimes need xrandr after resume": I don't think I can > >> bisect that. It only happens sometimes

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume

2016-09-14 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2016-09-14 10:38:18, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> I have > >> > >> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset > >> Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) >

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume

2016-09-14 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2016-09-13 22:38:45, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi. > > Am Dienstag, 13. September 2016, 22:23:50 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek: > > I have > > > > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset > > Integrated Graphics Controller (re

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume

2016-09-13 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > I have > > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset > Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) > > In previous kernels, resume worked ok. With 4.8-rc1, I quite often (1 > in 10 resumes?) get in state where primary monitor (DVI) is dead (in > powersave) and all w

[Intel-gfx] 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume

2016-09-13 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I have 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) In previous kernels, resume worked ok. With 4.8-rc1, I quite often (1 in 10 resumes?) get in state where primary monitor (DVI) is dead (in powersave) and all windows move to s

Re: [Intel-gfx] Kernel stability on baytrail machines

2016-07-13 Thread Pavel Machek
> On Tue 2016-07-12 16:41:58, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >>Hi Alan, > >> > >>(Adding interested people to this thread) > >> > >>On 09 Apr 08:14 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > >I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently > >underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how

Re: [Intel-gfx] Kernel stability on baytrail machines

2016-07-12 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2016-07-12 16:41:58, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hi Alan, > > (Adding interested people to this thread) > > On 09 Apr 08:14 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > > > I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently > > > > underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how much curr

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.7-rc0: redshift stopped working on intel display

2016-06-08 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Could you try to apply the following patch [1], hopefully this fixes > the issue for you. > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/89111/ I updated the kernel, applied the patch and yes, that helped. Thanks! P

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.7-rc0: redshift stopped working on intel display

2016-05-28 Thread Pavel Machek
On Sat 2016-05-28 12:12:06, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > It looks like redshift stopped working. Even pretty crazy settings > have no visible effect: > > pavel@amd:~$ redshift -O 1500 -g 6.6:6.6:6.6 > Using method `randr'. > pavel@amd:~$ redshift -x > Using meth

[Intel-gfx] 4.7-rc0: redshift stopped working on intel display

2016-05-28 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! It looks like redshift stopped working. Even pretty crazy settings have no visible effect: pavel@amd:~$ redshift -O 1500 -g 6.6:6.6:6.6 Using method `randr'. pavel@amd:~$ redshift -x Using method `randr'. pavel@amd:~$ uname -a Linux amd 4.6.0 #47 SMP Fri May 27 12:07:10 CEST 2016 x86_64 GNU/L

Re: [Intel-gfx] Suspend To RAM failure in >= 4.1 - bissected to "drm/i915: Track GEN6 page table usage"

2016-01-04 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I then ran a git bissect between v4.0 and v4.1 from Linus's tree and > > found the "guilty" commit was > > > > commit 317b4e903636305cfe702ab3e5b3d68547a69e72 > > Author: Ben Widawsky > > Date: Mon Mar 16 16:00:55 2015 + > > > > drm/i915: Extract context switch skip and add pd l

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Limit the busy wait on requests to 2us not 10ms!

2015-12-03 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Reported-by: Jens Axboe > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/12/621 > Cc: Jens Axboe > Cc; "Rogozhkin, Dmitry V" > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin > Cc: Eero Tamminen > Cc: "Rantala, Valtteri" > Cc: sta...@kernel.vger.org > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 28 +

[Intel-gfx] 4.0 -> 4.1 regression : after resume from s2ram both internal and external display of a docked ThinkPad ate black

2015-12-03 Thread Pavel Machek
> >>> commit e7d6f7d708290da1b7c92f533444b042c79412e0 > >>> Author: Dave Airlie > >>> Date: Mon Dec 8 13:23:37 2014 +1000 > >>> > >>> drm/i915: resume MST after reading back hw state > >> Is there anything else what I can do ? > >> > >> Current kernels up to 4.2.3 and 4.3-rc3 (not harde

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.0.8->4.1.3 : after resume from s2ram both internal and external display of a docked ThinkPad ate black

2015-10-29 Thread Pavel Machek
On Sun 2015-10-04 18:30:14, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 08/04/2015 02:29 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > > On 08/02/2015 09:43 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> Any chance to bisect it? > > Did it. > > > > FWIW: the mentioned commit was introduced between 3.18 and 3.19

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.0.8->4.1.3 : after resume from s2ram both internal and external display of a docked ThinkPad ate black

2015-08-02 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2015-07-29 15:54:00, Toralf Förster wrote: > Undocking helps, and then I can dock again. > > This happens at a hardened 64 bit Gentoo with i915, but I think, it is > not hardened related, or ? Any chance to bisect it? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: apply the PCI_D0/D3 hibernation workaround everywhere on pre GEN6

2015-07-01 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2015-07-01 13:53:31, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:51:27AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > - Embedded panels have a well defined shutdown sequence. We > > don't > > > > > > > have > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: apply the PCI_D0/D3 hibernation workaround everywhere on pre GEN6

2015-07-01 Thread Pavel Machek
> > > - Embedded panels have a well defined shutdown sequence. We don't > > > have > > > any good reason to not follow this, in fact for some panels the > > > subsequent reinitialization could be problematic in case of a hard > > > power-off. (Thanks to Jani for this info) > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: apply the PCI_D0/D3 hibernation workaround everywhere on pre GEN6

2015-07-01 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2015-07-01 11:35:48, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> commit da2bc1b9db3351addd293e5b82757efe1f77ed1d > >> Author: Imre Deak > >> Date: Thu Oct 23 19:23:26 2014 +0300 > >> > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: apply the PCI_D0/D3 hibernation workaround everywhere on pre GEN6

2015-06-30 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > commit da2bc1b9db3351addd293e5b82757efe1f77ed1d > Author: Imre Deak > Date: Thu Oct 23 19:23:26 2014 +0300 > > drm/i915: add poweroff_late handler > > introduced a regression on old platforms during hibernation. A workaround was > added in > > commit ab3be73fa7b43f4c3648ce29b5fd649

[Intel-gfx] 4.1-rc3: i915-related crash

2015-05-26 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Debian 8 based system. X suddenly froze. Not quite reproducible, I'm afraid. Pavel [331445.592203] ftdi_sio 5-2:1.0: device disconnected [331447.063345] r8169 :03:00.0 eth0: link up [331447.930260] PM: resume of devices comp

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] work around warning in i915_gem_gtt

2014-07-28 Thread Pavel Machek
Gcc warns that addr might be used uninitialized. It may not, but I see why gcc gets confused. Additionally, hiding code with side-effects inside WARN_ON() argument seems uncool, so I moved it outside. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.15-rc: regression in suspend

2014-07-11 Thread Pavel Machek
On Mon 2014-07-07 10:39:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that > > > 3.16-rc1 no

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Don't set the 8to6 dither flag when not scaling"

2014-07-09 Thread Pavel Machek
complete non-sense since the WARNING > backtraces in the references bugzilla are about > gmch_pfit.lvds_border_bits mismatch, not at all about the dither bit. > That one seems to work. > > Cc: Jiri Kosina Acked-by: Pavel Machek

  1   2   >