Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] Xv: set up pipeline for Xv on Ivybridge

2011-06-23 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:47:47AM +0800, Xiang, Haihao wrote: > The configuration is same as that on Sandybridge, but > many state commands are changed > > Signed-off-by: Xiang, Haihao > --- > src/i965_reg.h | 132 > src/i965_video.c | 446 > +++

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Disable DRI2 if we're running on shadowfb

2010-09-22 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:47:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Without this change, DRI2 gets enabled but doesn't work and glxinfo > crashes my X server. I think we need a bigger hammer than this. The problem is that when we disable acceleration (EIO returned from execbuffer), the same thing h

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: wait for actual vblank, not just 20ms

2010-08-18 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:00:36PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Waiting for a hard coded 20ms isn't always enough to make sure a vblank > period has actually occurred, so add code to make sure we really have > passed through a vblank period (or that the pipe is off when disabling). > > This preven

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3d performance very low

2010-07-30 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:17:30PM +0200, Hanno B??ck wrote: > Hi, > > it seems I'm currently getting insanely slow 3d performance on my system. > q3demo benchmark (run with ` to start console, timedemo 1, demo demo001) > gives > me 57 fps. I think even my old r200 got more than 100 there. I'l

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] introduce intel_ring_buffer structure

2010-05-14 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:39:22AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for reviewing the patch. > > To clarify, > This patch is used for H.264/VC1 decoding. > Abstract ring buffer is also needed for our later generation GPUs, > Because there are more types of ring buffer to come. > > H.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: don't allow tiling changes on pinned buffers

2010-04-23 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:12:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Makes no sense and complicates matters for pipelined tiling changes. > So don't allow it and return -EBUSY. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c |3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Unbind the bo if the user requests a different alignment

2010-04-18 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:29:24AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Darn. The current incarnation was literally for glyph masks, clip masks > > and all the other short-lived write-once, immediately use as source > > buffers within the s