On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next me
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c between commit abca9e454498 ("drm: Pass
>> 'flag
he FDI.
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie
[olof: Fixup for recent base, switched from if/else to single call]
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson
---
Daniel,
This applies on top of -next, which I'm presuming is close to your
for-3.13 base right now. It'd be good to see this go in since it's
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 05:59:43PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> From: Duncan Laurie
>>
>> We had been using a DMI table workaround to select the right
>> frequency for devices, but this is fragile and must b
ts
> an appropriate max PWM value for a frequency of 200 Hz.
>
> If no refclk frequency is found, the max PWM will be zero, which results
> in no change to the PWM registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Que
Acked-by: Olof Johansson
Looks
Hi,
A collection of nits below.
Thanks,
-Olof
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 07:48:55PM -0800, Simon Que wrote:
> If the firmware did not initialize the backlight PWM registers, set up a
> default PWM frequency of 200 Hz. This is determined using the following
> formula:
>
> freq = refclk / (128
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Simon Que wrote:
> If the firmware did not initialize the backlight PWM registers, set up a
> default PWM frequency of 200 Hz. This is determined using the following
> formula:
>
> freq = refclk / (128 * pwm_max)
>
> The PWM register allows the max PWM value
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 03:02:00PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>> How about a DMI table check that overrides whatever is setup (or not
>> setup) from the video bios? We know exactly what platforms need this
>>
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 02:41:56PM -0800, Simon Que wrote:
>
>> There is a backup kernel partition that can be used for boot.
>>
>> Failing that, the system can boot from a recovery image over USB.
>
> So absolutely no video code in the firm
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:28:01 +0100
> Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:58:40 +0100, Chris Wilson <
> ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > > Does any one have a strong "this will damage my hardware" objection?
> Are
> > > the val
10 matches
Mail list logo
