Re: [linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement)

hi, Eric, On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 07:25:32PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of > > stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec > > These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm-intel:drm-intel-gt-next] [drm/i915] [confidence: ] 9bb66c179f: assertion_failure

hi, Jani, On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 11:59:43AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 07 Dec 2023, kernel test robot wrote: > > Hello, > > > > kernel test robot noticed "assertion_failure" on: > > > > commit: 9bb66c179f50e61df20ba13c9b34ca17d00b05fb ("drm/i915: Reserve some > > kernel space per vm")

Re: [Intel-gfx] [linus:master] [file] 0ede61d858: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -2.9% regression

hi, Linus, On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 03:20:58PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 at 12:23, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > IOW, I might have messed up some "trivial cleanup" when prepping for > > sending it out... > > Bah. Famous last words. One of the "trivial cleanups" made the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression

t; | > > | > > | > > | > >5000 |-+