Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/9] perf/core: open access for CAP_SYS_PERFMON privileged process

2020-01-11 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
t" > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > Message-ID: > > On January 10, 2020 9:23:27 PM GMT-03:00, Song Liu > wrote: > > > > > >> On Jan 10, 2020, at 3:47 PM, Masami Hiramatsu > >wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:45:31 -0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/9] perf/core: open access for CAP_SYS_PERFMON privileged process

2020-01-10 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:45:31 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:52:13AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:02:34 +0100 Peter Zijlstra > > wrote: > > > Again, this only allows attaching to previously created kp

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/9] perf/core: open access for CAP_SYS_PERFMON privileged process

2020-01-10 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
t allow creating kprobes, right? > > That is; I don't think CAP_SYS_PERFMON should be allowed to create > kprobes. > > As might be clear; I don't actually know what the user-ABI is for > creating kprobes. There are 2 ABIs nowadays, ftrace and ebpf. perf

Re: [Intel-gfx] [lockdep] drm/i915: possible circular locking dependency in i915 driver init

2016-08-16 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:39:29 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:01:35PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've found a suspicious circular locking dependency in i915 by lockdep. > > It seems main driver initialization th

[Intel-gfx] [lockdep] drm/i915: possible circular locking dependency in i915 driver init

2016-08-16 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
*** DEADLOCK *** And i915 related kconfigs are here: CONFIG_DRM_I915=m CONFIG_DRM_I915_PRELIMINARY_HW_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_DRM_I915_USERPTR=y CONFIG_DRM_I915_GVT=y # CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR is not set # CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG is not set I've hit this on my DELL XPS15 whic