On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:09:27AM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
>> > What I don't really like is the old approach of trying to abstract away
>> > differences between Linux and *BSD in drmP.h with some screaming macros.
&
> What I don't really like is the old approach of trying to abstract away
> differences between Linux and *BSD in drmP.h with some screaming macros.
> Given the imbalance of manpower between Linux and *BSD I think the best
> (and probably only really) approach is to have linux compat types and
> wr
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2016, "K. Macy" > wrote:
> > That would be much appreciated. I have the diff with upstream down to
> > ~450 lines, so there likely isn't a whole lot that needs to change.
> > However, there may b
> I don't have any FreeBSD experience and I don't know what kind of team
> of developers you have, but it is my educated guess that you'll have
> plenty of more productive things to do than trying to maintain a
> significant amount of delta with upstream while also trying to stay
> up-to-date.
I a
