Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/locking: Allow NULL crtc in drm_modeset_legacy_acquire_ctx

2014-11-24 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
eed to dodge the oops and look at the global > acquire ctx. > > v2: Actually fix the oops for real and don't just move it two lines > down. That requires that we pass a drm_device pointer for the cases > where crtc could be NULL. > > Reported-by: "Jasper St. Pierre&q

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic-helper: Skip vblank waits for unchanged fbs

2014-11-24 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
With the oops fix: Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre Tested-by: Jasper St. Pierre On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Especially with legacy cursor ioctls existing userspace assumes that > you can pile up lots of updates in one go. The super-proper way to > sup

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2 xf86-video-intel] Two DRI3/Present bug fixes for UXA

2014-09-12 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Why doesn't mesa allocate buffers in the same way for those chips, then? Do you have any documentation about this? On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:09:07PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > [PATCH 2/2] Correct BO allocation alignment > > > > This