On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
cpumask. That does not make sense.
The XEN impleme
On 11.12.20 11:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11 2020 at 07:17, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu interrupts and
On 11.12.20 00:20, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
cpumask. That does not make sense.
The XEN impleme
On 13.08.20 17:10, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 8/13/20 6:02 PM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 13.08.20 08:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Series pushed to:
xen/tip.git for-linus-5.9
The top patch has strange title though:
"Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] dr
On 13.08.20 08:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Series pushed to:
xen/tip.git for-linus-5.9
Juergen
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On 13.08.20 08:32, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Juergen, Boris,
can we please merge these via Xen Linux tree as I have collected enough Ack/R-b?
The series has DRM patches, but those anyway are Xen related, so I think
this should be fine from DRI point of view.
Yes, fine with me.
Juergen
On 04.08.20 08:35, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 8/4/20 9:12 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 31.07.20 14:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
The patch c575b7eeb89f: "drm/xen-front: Add support for Xen PV
display frontend" from Apr 3, 2018, leads to the
On 31.07.20 14:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
This is the sync up with the canonical definition of the
display protocol in Xen.
1. Add protocol version as an integer
Version string, which is in fact an integer, is hard to handle in the
code that supports diff
On 31.07.20 14:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
The patch c575b7eeb89f: "drm/xen-front: Add support for Xen PV
display frontend" from Apr 3, 2018, leads to the following static
checker warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_gem.c:140 xen_drm_front_ge
On 31.07.20 14:51, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
It is possible that the scatter-gather table during dmabuf import has
non-zero offset of the data, but user-space doesn't expect that.
Fix this by failing the import, so user-space doesn't access wrong data.
Fixes:
On 18.11.19 11:35, Daniel Vetter wrote:
There's no in-kernel users for the k(un)map stuff. And the mmap one is
actively harmful - return 0 and then _not_ actually mmaping can't end
well.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky
Cc: Juergen Gross
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: xen-de...@l
11 matches
Mail list logo
