Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove combination mode for backlight control, again

2012-08-30 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Tue, August 28, 2012 16:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:39:34PM +0200, Indan Zupancic wrote: >> Some backlight problems on GEN4 can be solved by not fiddling with the >> backlight. The current code sets the backlight to 0 to disable the panel >> (la

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: save/restore the legacy backlight control

2012-08-30 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Tue, August 28, 2012 17:15, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:49:15PM +0200, Indan Zupancic wrote: >> By the way, saving LBPC only makes sense if it's done before it was >> set to 0 to disable the panel. I don't know if the current code does >> th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: save/restore the legacy backlight control

2012-08-28 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Tue, August 28, 2012 16:14, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:56:31PM +0200, Indan Zupancic wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, August 28, 2012 08:53, Jani Nikula wrote: >> > From: Daniel Vetter >> > >> > This is a prep patch t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: remove combination mode for backlight control, again

2012-08-28 Thread Indan Zupancic
Hello, You seem to be making exactly the same mistake I made. On Tue, August 28, 2012 08:53, Jani Nikula wrote: > The combination/legacy mode was first removed in > > commit 951f3512dba5bd44cda3e5ee22b4b522e4bb09fb > Author: Indan Zupancic > Date: Thu Feb 17 02:41:49 2011 +0

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: save/restore the legacy backlight control

2012-08-28 Thread Indan Zupancic
Hello, On Tue, August 28, 2012 08:53, Jani Nikula wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter > > This is a prep patch to stop drm/i915 from changing the LBPC registers > itself - but we still need to properly save/restore it on > suspend/resume. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI/Intel: Rework Opregion support

2011-03-15 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Wed, March 16, 2011 03:17, Alex Deucher wrote: > It's not HDCP, encrypted bluray is the main issue. And while > there are hacks for bluray around already, contractual obligations > don't care whether existing hacks are available or not. So the contract says to keep it secret, not to make it se

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI/Intel: Rework Opregion support

2011-03-15 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Tue, March 15, 2011 17:06, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Indan Zupancic wrote: >> They don't give their Linux devs any Fusion hardware, nor do they >> open the UVD spec, but at least they release info like this. > > They do give us fus

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI/Intel: Rework Opregion support

2011-03-15 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Tue, March 15, 2011 12:27, Peter Stuge wrote: > coreboot has existed for about eleven years and some 250 mainboards of > varying shapes and sizes (from laptop to server) are supported, but it's I've been wanting to get rid of BIOSes and use Coreboot for ages, but the amount of hassle needed to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ACPI/Intel: Rework Opregion support

2011-03-15 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Tue, March 15, 2011 09:37, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:18:02 +0100 (CET), "Indan Zupancic" > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Some nitpicks below. >> >> On Mon, March 14, 2011 18:59, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > Note: neither the o