Hi Auld,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:31:54PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 8 May 2018 at 10:05, wrote:
> > From: Changbin Du
> >
> > Finally, this add the first huge gtt support for GVTg - 64K pages. Since
> > 64K page and 4K page cannot be mixed on the same page table, so we always
> > split a
Hi Auld,
Thanks for your review.
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:31:03PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 8 May 2018 at 10:05, wrote:
> > From: Changbin Du
> > +static int gvt_dma_map_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn,
> > + dma_addr_t *dma_addr, unsigned long size)
> > +
2:07:28 +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 14:08 +0800, Du, Changbin wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:32:30AM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> > > > > > > Is skl-gvtdvm not having vGPU active?
> > >
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:32:30AM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
> Is skl-gvtdvm not having vGPU active?
>
> It has flag X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR set however it might be set on host too
> so relying intel_vgpu_active().
>
Do you mean flag X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR is set on host, too? This is weird
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 11:11:15AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting changbin...@intel.com (2017-12-22 06:31:49)
> > From: Changbin Du
> >
> > Our QA reported a problem caused by movntdqa instructions. Currently,
> > the KVM hypervisor doesn't support VEX-prefix instructions emulation.
> > If
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:56:38AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Du, Changbin (2017-12-21 09:52:16)
> > Hi Chris,
> > Our QA reported a problem caused by movntdqa instructions. Currently, the
> > KVM
> > hypervisor doesn't support VEX-prefix
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:58:38AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Du, Changbin (2017-12-21 09:52:16)
> > Hi Chris,
> > Our QA reported a problem caused by movntdqa instructions. Currently, the
> > KVM
> > hypervisor doesn't support VEX-prefix
Hi Chris,
Our QA reported a problem caused by movntdqa instructions. Currently, the KVM
hypervisor doesn't support VEX-prefix instructions emulation. If users
passthrough
a GPU to guest with vfio option 'x-no-mmap=on', then all access to the BARs will
be trapped and emulated. The KVM hypervisor wo
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:50:04PM +0800, Tina Zhang wrote:
> Windows guest driver needs vbt in opregion, to configure the setting
> for display. Without opregion support, the display registers won't
> be set and this blocks display model to get the correct information
> of the guest display plane.
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting changbin...@intel.com (2017-09-01 08:08:26)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
> > index 5fe2cd8..429ce5f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_f
Hi chris,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:27:18AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting changbin...@intel.com (2017-08-30 09:54:21)
> > This patch added two new api to the fence management code:
> > - i915_reserve_one_fence() will try to find a free fence from fence_list
> >and force-remove vma if
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:58:55PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 25 May 2017, "Du, Changbin" wrote:
> >> Note:
> >>select should be used with care. select will force
> >>a symbol to a value without visiting the dependencies.
> >&
Hi, Jani, just relized you are in i915 team. :)
> > +menu "Intel GVT-g graphics virtualization host support"
> > + depends on DRM_I915
> > + depends on 64BIT
> > +
> > config DRM_I915_GVT
> > -bool "Enable Intel GVT-g graphics virtualization host support"
> > -depends on DRM_I
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:21:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:50:39PM +0800, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Changbin Du
> >
> > At least we need one MPT module (currently only have one) selected
> > to get GVTg functional. When GVTg is enabled while no MPT sel
> > > Since intel_gvt_init() is called at early initialization stage and
> > > require the status notifier head has been initiated, I initiate it in
> > > intel_engine_setup().
> > >
> > > v2: remove a redundant newline. (chris)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du
> > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wil
hi, chris,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:17:17PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:27:24PM +0800, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Changbin Du
> >
> > GVTg has introduced the context status notifier to schedule the GVTg
> > workload. At that time, the notifier is bound t
hi, is there any comments for this? I'd like hear chris and daniel's
comments. :)
Thanks,
Changbin
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:23:05PM +0800, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du
>
> hi, Daniel, Chris and All,
> As you know, GVTg introduced the context status notifier to schedule
> t
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 01:46:36PM +0800, changbin...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: "Du, Changbin"
> >
> > This patch fix a crash in function reset_common_ring. In this case,
> > the port[0].request is null when reset the render ring, so a null
> > derefe
18 matches
Mail list logo
