Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.17-rc2: Could not determine valid watermarks for inherited state

2018-04-26 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 06:25:13PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 06:16:41PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:56:14PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:27:19AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.17-rc2: Could not determine valid watermarks for inherited state

2018-04-26 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:10:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:27:13AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > This warning just started appearing during boot on a machine I upgraded > > to 4.17-rc2. The warning seems to have been there since 2015, but it

[Intel-gfx] 4.17-rc2: Could not determine valid watermarks for inherited state

2018-04-23 Thread Dave Jones
This warning just started appearing during boot on a machine I upgraded to 4.17-rc2. The warning seems to have been there since 2015, but it has never triggered before today. Dave [1.158500] fb: switching to inteldrmfb from EFI VGA [1.159073] Console: switching to colour dummy de

Re: [Intel-gfx] [regression] [git pull] drm for 4.3

2015-09-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 09:15:58AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:00:17AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > Cc'ing Maarten and Matt; I'm guessing this may be related to one of > > > their recent patches. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm for 4.3

2015-09-21 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:45:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:40:53PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Hi Linus, > > > > This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably > the biggest > > amount

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm for 4.3

2015-09-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:40:53PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Hi Linus, > > This is the main pull request for the drm for 4.3. Nouveau is probably the > biggest > amount of changes in here, since it missed 4.2. Highlights below, along with > the usual > bunch of fixes. There are a fe

[Intel-gfx] i915/kasan: out of bounds access in i915_cmd_parser_init_ring

2015-08-13 Thread Dave Jones
I finally got around to playing with kasan. It didn't end well. I added some debugging to validate_cmds_sorted to print out the table sizes right before the stack traces. Dave validate_cmds_sorted: table:a1fb4220 cmd_table_count:3 validate_cmds_sorted: table:a1fb4220 tabl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm fixes

2015-03-25 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I've started seeing this one too as of rc5. > > Along with.. > > Yeah we're freeing memory too early with these bugs. To get up to the > current debug state can you please cherry-pick > > commit f55548b5af87ebfc586ca757489

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm fixes

2015-03-25 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:33:42AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > I have a machine that no longer boots in a headless manner with -rc5. > It's an Celeron based NUC device. I blacklisted the i915 driver and > it boots fine, then I ran insmod manually and got the backtrace below. > This machine on

[Intel-gfx] dmar messages caused by graphics.

2014-10-17 Thread Dave Jones
Just hit this while fuzz-testing, (curiously, no graphics related stuff was happening, X isn't even loaded on that box). dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 dmar: DMAR:[DMA Write] Request device [00:02.0] fault addr 7ff000 DMAR:[fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set 00:02:0 is..

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix use-after-free in the shadow-attache exit code

2014-01-30 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 05:58:38PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > This regression has been introduced in > > commit b3f2333de8e81b089262b26d52272911523e605f > Author: Daniel Vetter > Date: Wed Dec 11 11:34:31 2013 +0100 > > drm: restrict the device list for shadow attached drivers >

[Intel-gfx] 'power well on' trace in Linus current tree.

2013-12-13 Thread Dave Jones
I left this on overnight, and this morning this was in the log. Dave WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 131 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:6309 hsw_enable_pc8_work+0x6a9/0x6d0() Power well on Modules linked in: tun hidp bnep rfcomm can_raw can_bcm caif_socket caif phonet af_rxrpc bluetooth c

Re: [Intel-gfx] pipe_off wait timed out

2013-05-21 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:10:36AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > > This is new to me as of 3.10-rc2. > > If this is an ironlake with a DP output it's a know issue which seems > to pop up every once in a while.

[Intel-gfx] pipe_off wait timed out

2013-05-21 Thread Dave Jones
This is new to me as of 3.10-rc2. WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:997 intel_wait_for_pipe_off+0x194/0x1a0 [i915]() pipe_off wait timed out Modules linked in: ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 nf_nat xt_LOG xt_limit ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Sanity check incoming ioctl data for a NULL pointer

2013-03-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:50:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Doesn't that mean that we need these checks everywhere? Or at least a > fixup in drm core proper? > > And I think we need to add trinity to our test setup eventually ;-) Note that trinity's ioctl fuzzing is still very new (adde