With Haswell, 5.4Gbps is supported. And almost all of the code was
already in place already. All that was missing was this tiny bit of
additional wiring.
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 24
1 file changed, 20
The driver is not functional at this depth, so tell the user as much and
bail out.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31375
---
src/intel_driver.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/intel_driver.c b/src/intel_driver.c
index 7807106..
Ben Widawsky writes:
> /sys/kernel/debug has more or less been the standard location of debugfs
> for several years now. Other parts of DRM already use this location, so
> we should as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth
-Carl
pgpygWO4962Aw.pgp
D
Eric Anholt writes:
> I have not tested it yet, but hopefully when cworth gets home he will.
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth
Tested-by: Carl Worth
Thanks, Eric! This is perfect.
-Carl
--
carl.d.wo...@intel.com
pgp0yyvRoVr80.pgp
Description: PGP signat
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:37:01 -0800 (PST), ic...@kemper.freedesktop.org (Chris
Wilson) wrote:
> [Modified version of U. Artie Eoff's commit to remove the duplicated
> string. The paraphrased commit message is repeated below for
> clarity.]
Close. But if you look a *bit* more closely yo
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:10:41 -0700, "U. Artie Eoff"
wrote:
> Added m4 check for XORG_DRIVER_CHECK_EXT macro definition. Updated m4
> fatal messages to give better hint on how to resolve error when xorg
> macros are missing. Previously, configure would continue in spite of
> the missing macros a
Log of changes from 2.13.0 to 2.13.901
--
Adam Jackson (1):
intel: Listen for hotplug uevents (V3)
Carl Worth (2):
NEWS: Add release notes for 2.13.901 snapshot.
Update version number to 2.13.901
Chris Wilson (26):
video: Disable
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:41:45 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Find a hw engineer, and ask him nicely why his ringbuffer registers return
> 0 *most* of the time.
Ugh.
> Having the error there was to make sure people noticed and I
> could find out just how many SNB revisions failed. I presume you hav
The commit below causes my Sandybridge system to fail at initial KMS
initialization:
Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099032] i915 :00:02.0: irq 42 for MSI/M
SI-X
Aug 27 18:58:04 livid kernel: [9.099086] [drm:init_ring_common] *ERROR*
render ring initialization failed ctl hea
* Fix to disable dri2 after fallbacks are forced on.
All changes from 2.12.0 to 2.13.0
-----
Carl Worth (7):
NEWS: Add notes for the 2.12.901 snapshot
Bump version to 2.12.901
Fix to depend on the (just-released) libdrm >= 2.4.22
Add release no
--
Carl Worth (3):
Fix to depend on the (just-released) libdrm >= 2.4.22
Add release notes for the 2.12.902 snapshot.
Increment version to 2.12.902
Chris Wilson (3):
display: Refactor is_panel()
Disable dri2 after forc
r eDP panels incorrectly being given only a single, valid mode
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30069
* Fix GPU hang involving clipped SRC copies
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30120
List of all changes from 2.12.0 to 2.12.901
---
website
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28497
All changes from 2.11.0 to 2.12.0
=====
Carl Worth (5):
Fix to require libdrm 2.4.19 or newer.
NEWS: Add notes for 2.11.901
Update version to 2.11.901
NEWS: Add notes for the 2.12.0
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:31:31 -0300, Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva
wrote:
> When using an 2.9 driver compiled for 1.7 xorg, and 1.8 xorg, X
> complains about ABI mismatch. Recompiling the driver is supposed to
> fix this, but, I get the same error I got while building from git
> sources. In fact I
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:34:43 -0300, Elias Gabriel Amaral da Silva
wrote:
> 2010/6/15 Carl Worth :
> Hello! I'm, maybe, getting the same thing here. I haven't tested the
> release candidate, but with Xorg 1.8 and driver 2.11, and a
> kms-enabled 2.6.34 kernel, using gentoo
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:03:27 +0200, Clemens Eisserer
wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> > Vasily, Clemens can you both try reverting f74b3f82 on top of 2.11.901
> > and seeing if that fixes the corruption for you. It did not seem to make
> > a difference here...
>
> Sorry if that sounds stupid, but how can
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:12:28 +0200, Marc Deop i ArgemÃ
wrote:
> That looks like a lot of work, ain't it? :S
It shouldn't be, once you get the hang of compiling and running against
a locally-compiled driver. There are about 176 commits between 2.11.0
and 2.11.901 so that should only require about
> Sorry, but I got artifacts with latest version of libdrm and xf86-video-intel
> on 945gm hardware (see attached screenshot).
Thanks for the report.
> If you need some additional info - just ask.
Actually, I do. I'm not familiar enough with the particular theme you're
using to know what looks
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:05:15 +0200, Marc Deop i ArgemÃ
wrote:
> The system just freezes :(
>
> I'm running archlinux, Mesa 7.8.1, libdrm 2.4.21, Xorg-server 1.8.1.901,
> kernel 2.6.34.
If the other components remain the same and you change only the driver
to an older version does it then work
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:18:17 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> > New requirements compared to 2.10
> > -
> > * Libdrm >= 2.4.19
> >
> The requirement is actuall
ges from 2.11.0 to 2.11.901
--
Carl Worth (3):
Fix to require libdrm 2.4.19 or newer.
NEWS: Add notes for 2.11.901
Update version to 2.11.901
Chris Wilson (124):
uxa: Add fallback warnings for PutImage.
Review i830_pad_drawable_wi
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:48:18 -0400, Matt Turner wrote:
> I've got a similar experience--I actually had two patches /accepted/
> and supposedly tucked away in a branch for merging after 2.11 was
> released. They've never been merged. I've pinged Carl at least twice,
> heard nothing back.
>
> Not s
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:28:22 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> I've sent three patches to the list for review recently, and posed a
> question about possible buggy palette handling. Two of the patches I
> sent fix bugs (one "real", one a build issue), and there is a one
> clean-up.
>
> I've had no re
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:57:25 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Spatial dither is better than nothing, but ST is even better.
Hi Adam,
I'm going through the past couple weeks of traffic on the list looking
for patches that haven't gotten picked up yet.
So I'd love to review one like this, but it woul
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:42:37 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Since it's only in -next right now, do you have plans to look into why
> this went wrong? I'm concerned that we're reverting a bugfix to
> "revisit later" with no plan to actually revisit later.
That was my attempt to get my buglist a bit
This reverts commit cfecde435dda78248d6fcdc424bed68d5db6be0b.
The commit was first created as an attempt to fix LVDS initialiazation
on Ironlake. Testing revealed that it didn't fix that, but it was
assumed to still be correct anyway.
Subsequent testing has revealed that this commit has caused ot
26 matches
Mail list logo
