>
> On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 08:00 +, Argotti, Yann wrote:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi
> > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 18:57 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > >
>
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 18:57 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > We've been ignoring the poor bugzilla reporters that say PSR causes
> > system lockups and all other sorts of problems. The earliest bug
> > report is from April, so I thi
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Updated drm-intel-testing
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:40:25AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > New -testing cycle with cool stuff:
> > First round of stuff for 4.10!
>
> ofc this should have been 4.11 ...
> -Daniel
Thanks Daniel!
with Julian we are re
>
> On 06/10/16 13:26, Conselvan De Oliveira, Ander wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 13:11 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, "Argotti, Yann" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> > On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
> > wrote:
> > > This week regressions
> >
> > In the past we used "regression", "bisect_pending", and "bisected" in
> > the bugzilla "Keywords" field. Can we start using those again, please?
>
> I think this is a very good idea Jani. So we can start to s
>
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2016, Jairo Miramontes
> wrote:
> > This week regressions
>
> In the past we used "regression", "bisect_pending", and "bisected" in
> the bugzilla "Keywords" field. Can we start using those again, please?
I think this is a very good idea Jani. So we can start to scrub current
>
> > From: Zanoni, Paulo R
> > Em Sex, 2016-09-16 às 16:59 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu:
> > > Only production steppings are supported, drop workarounds for
> > > anything else. The series is split by revision so we can bikeshed if
> > > there are steppings some people still need to use for some r
