Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch V2 09/29] mm/kasan: Simplify stacktrace handling

On 4/18/19 11:41 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage > array based interfaces. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov > Cc: Andrey Ryabinin > Cc: Alexander Potapenko > Cc: kasan-.

Re: [Intel-gfx] SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation)

On 07/31/2018 09:51 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:49 AM Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> So the re-use might initialize the fields lazily, not necessarily using a >> ctor. > > In particular, the pattern that nf_conntrack uses looks like it is safe. > > If you have a well

[Intel-gfx] SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation)

On 07/31/2018 07:04 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> Somewhat offtopic, but I can't understand how SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU >> slabs can be useful without ctors or at least memset(0). Objects in >> such slabs need to be type-stable, but I can't understand how it's >&g

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: fix use-after-free in page_flip_completed()

fork+0x27/0x40 Move queue_work() after trace_i915_flip_complete() to fix this. Fixes: e5510fac98a7 ("drm/i915: add tracepoints for flip requests & completions") Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletion