Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: don't trylock in the gpu reset code

> > -       if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->struct_mutex)) > -               return -EBUSY; > +       mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > >        i915_gem_reset(dev); > But ... the original code: Correct me if I'm wrong. In every manual I've found mutex_trylock(...) returns 0 on success. So if(!mutex_tr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] intel_gpu_tool: initial support for non-screen output

My bad, it is necessary to add file. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] intel_gpu_tool: initial support for non-screen output

Is that really necessary? Isn't "intel_gpu_tool > logfile" enough? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx