[Intel-gfx] [bug report] drm/i915: Add support for moving fence waiting

Hello Maarten Lankhorst, This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings. The patch f6c466b84cfa: "drm/i915: Add support for moving fence waiting" from Nov 22, 2021, leads to the following Smatch complaint: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c:1015 i915_vma_pin_ww() error: w

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma_fence_array: Fix PENDING_ERROR leak in dma_fence_array_signaled()

If a dma_fence_array is reported signaled by a call to dma_fence_is_signaled(), it may leak the PENDING_ERROR status. Fix this by clearing the PENDING_ERROR status if we return true in dma_fence_array_signaled(). Fixes: 1f70b8b812f3 ("dma-fence: Propagate errors to dma-fence-array container") Cc:

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for More preparation for multi gt patches (rev4)

== Series Details == Series: More preparation for multi gt patches (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97020/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10934_full -> Patchwork_21691_full Summary --

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for More preparation for multi gt patches (rev4)

== Series Details == Series: More preparation for multi gt patches (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97020/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10934 -> Patchwork_21691 Summary --- **SUC

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for More preparation for multi gt patches (rev4)

== Series Details == Series: More preparation for multi gt patches (rev4) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97020/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip Sparse version: v0.6.2 Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/2] drm/i915: Use to_root_gt() to refer to the root tile

Starting from a patch from Matt to_root_gt() returns the reference to the root tile in order to abstract the root tile from th callers. Being the root tile identified as tile '0', embed the id in the name so that i915->gt becomes i915->gt0. The renaming has been mostly done with the following com

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/2] drm/i915: Store backpointer to GT in uncore

From: Michał Winiarski We now support a per-gt uncore, yet we're not able to infer which GT we're operating upon. Let's store a backpointer for now. Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski Signed-off-by: Matt Roper Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/2] More preparation for multi gt patches

Hi, the first of the two patches concludes the first stage of refactoring which makes the use of intel_gt on the different subsystem. It's taken from Matt's series and it has alread been reviewed. The patch has just been replaced before any multitile patches and I think it can be already pushed.

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/fbc: More FBC refactoring (rev3)

== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/fbc: More FBC refactoring (rev3) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97239/ State : failure == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10934_full -> Patchwork_21690_full Summary ---