Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/44] drm/qxl: Don't use drm_device->dev_private

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 03:58:15PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Upcasting using a container_of macro is more typesafe, faster and > easier for the compiler to optimize. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Dave Airlie > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann > Cc: virtualizat...@lists.linux-foundation.org > Cc:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/44] drm/qxl: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 03:58:14PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Also need to remove the drm_dev_put from the remove hook. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Dave Airlie > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann > Cc: virtualizat...@lists.linux-foundation.org > Cc: spice-de...@lists.freedesktop.org Acked-by: Ge

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder

Hi Chris, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next linus/master v5.6 next-20200405] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability (rev6)

== Series Details == Series: Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability (rev6) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72273/ State : failure == Summary == Applying: capabilities: introduce CAP_PERFMON to kernel and user space Applying: perf/core: o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/12] doc/admin-guide: update kernel.rst with CAP_PERFMON information

On 05.04.2020 18:05, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 05:54:37PM +0300, Alexey Budankov escreveu: >> >> On 05.04.2020 17:41, Alexey Budankov wrote: >>> >>> On 05.04.2020 17:10, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:54:39AM +0300, Alexey Budankov

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/12] doc/admin-guide: update kernel.rst with CAP_PERFMON information

On 05.04.2020 17:41, Alexey Budankov wrote: > > On 05.04.2020 17:10, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> Em Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:54:39AM +0300, Alexey Budankov escreveu: >>> >>> Update kernel.rst documentation file with the information >>> related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure p

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/44] drm/udl: Use demv_drm_dev_alloc

Den 05.04.2020 15.47, skrev Daniel Vetter: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Noralf Trønnes wrote: >> >> >> >> Den 03.04.2020 15.57, skrev Daniel Vetter: >>> Also init the fbdev emulation before we register the device, that way >>> we can rely on the auto-cleanup and simplify the probe error cod

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 12/12] doc/admin-guide: update kernel.rst with CAP_PERFMON information

On 05.04.2020 17:10, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:54:39AM +0300, Alexey Budankov escreveu: >> >> Update kernel.rst documentation file with the information >> related to usage of CAP_PERFMON capability to secure performance >> monitoring and observability operations

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/44] drm/udl: Use demv_drm_dev_alloc

On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 12:18 PM Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > > > Den 03.04.2020 15.57, skrev Daniel Vetter: > > Also init the fbdev emulation before we register the device, that way > > we can rely on the auto-cleanup and simplify the probe error code even > > more. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vett

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/44] drm/managed: Cleanup of unused functions and polishing docs

Den 03.04.2020 15.58, skrev Daniel Vetter: > Following functions are only used internally, not by drivers: > - drm_dev_init > - devm_drm_dev_init > - drmm_add_final_kfree > > Also, now that we have a very slick and polished way to allocate a > drm_device with devm_drm_dev_alloc, update all the d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/44] drm: Add devm_drm_dev_alloc macro

Den 03.04.2020 15.57, skrev Daniel Vetter: > The kerneldoc is only added for this new function. Existing kerneldoc > and examples will be udated at the very end, since once all drivers > are converted over to devm_drm_dev_alloc we can unexport a lot of > interim functions and make the documentati

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/44] drm/udl: Use demv_drm_dev_alloc

Den 03.04.2020 15.57, skrev Daniel Vetter: > Also init the fbdev emulation before we register the device, that way > we can rely on the auto-cleanup and simplify the probe error code even > more. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Dave Airlie > Cc: Sean Paul > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann > Cc

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/44] drm/cirrus: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc

Den 03.04.2020 15.58, skrev Daniel Vetter: > Already using devm_drm_dev_init, so very simple replacment. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Dave Airlie > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Sam Ravnborg > Cc: "Noralf Trønnes" > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann > Cc: vi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/44] drm/ili9486: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc

Den 03.04.2020 15.58, skrev Daniel Vetter: > Already using devm_drm_dev_init, so very simple replacment. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Kamlesh Gurudasani > --- Acked-by: Noralf Trønnes ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/44] drm/repaper: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc

Den 03.04.2020 15.58, skrev Daniel Vetter: > Already using devm_drm_dev_init, so very simple replacment. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: "Noralf Trønnes" > --- Acked-by: Noralf Trønnes ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/44] drm/mi0283qt: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc

Den 03.04.2020 15.58, skrev Daniel Vetter: > Already using devm_drm_dev_init, so very simple replacment. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > Cc: "Noralf Trønnes" > --- Acked-by: Noralf Trønnes ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.o