Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: scrub 64K

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Matthew Auld (2018-05-10 22:12:13) > On 10 May 2018 at 20:56, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Matthew Auld (2018-05-10 20:00:06) > >> We write out all PTEs when operating in 64K mode, which is acceptable > >> given the assertion that the hw only cares about every 16th PTE and so > >> will

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 04/14] drm/i915/gvt: Detect 64K gtt entry by IPS bit of PDE

2018-05-10 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2018.05.10 16:17:35 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > > @@ -934,6 +944,20 @@ static int ppgtt_invalidate_spt(struct > > intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt) > > return ret; > > } > > > > +static bool vgpu_ips_enabled(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu) > > +{ > > + if (INTEL_GEN(vgpu->gvt->dev_priv) == 9)

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43032/ State : failure == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4164_full -> Patchwork_8978_full = == Summary - FAILURE == Serious unknown changes coming w

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table. URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43032/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4164 -> Patchwork_8978 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External URL: ht

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.

2018-05-10 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
Entry corresponding to 220 us setup time was missing. I am not aware of any specific bug this fixes, but this could potentially result in enabling PSR on a panel with a higher setup time requirement than supported by the hardware. I verified the value is present in eDP spec versions 1.3, 1.4 and 1

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/icl: Read the correct Gen11 interrupt registers (rev2)

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/icl: Read the correct Gen11 interrupt registers (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43027/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4164_full -> Patchwork_8977_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown chang

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/icl: Read the correct Gen11 interrupt registers (rev2)

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/icl: Read the correct Gen11 interrupt registers (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43027/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4164 -> Patchwork_8977 = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Read the correct Gen11 interrupt registers

2018-05-10 Thread Oscar Mateo
Stop reading some now deprecated interrupt registers in both debugfs and error state. Instead, read the new equivalents in the Gen11 interrupt repartitioning scheme. Note that the equivalent to the PM ISR & IIR cannot be read without affecting the current state of the system, so I've opted for lea

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/gen9: Add WaClearHIZ_WM_CHICKEN3 for bxt and glk

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gen9: Add WaClearHIZ_WM_CHICKEN3 for bxt and glk URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43024/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4164_full -> Patchwork_8975_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes com

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/icl: Read the correct Gen11 interrupt registers

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/icl: Read the correct Gen11 interrupt registers URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43027/ State : failure == Summary == CHK include/config/kernel.release CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h CHK include/generated/utsreleas

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Read the correct Gen11 interrupt registers

2018-05-10 Thread Oscar Mateo
Stop reading some now deprecated interrupt registers in both debugfs and error state. Instead, read the new equivalents in the Gen11 interrupt repartitioning scheme. Note that the equivalent to the PM ISR & IIR cannot be read without affecting the current state of the system, so I've opted for lea

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: scrub 64K

2018-05-10 Thread Matthew Auld
On 10 May 2018 at 20:56, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Matthew Auld (2018-05-10 20:00:06) >> We write out all PTEs when operating in 64K mode, which is acceptable >> given the assertion that the hw only cares about every 16th PTE and so >> will ignore everything else. However this may hide potent

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/selftests: scrub 64K

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: scrub 64K URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43023/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4164_full -> Patchwork_8974_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_8974_full

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 06/17] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allocate/initialize/release SLPC shared data

2018-05-10 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:31:51 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: Populate SLPC shared data with required default values for slice count, power source/plan, IA perf MSRs. v1: Update for SLPC interface version 2015.2.4. intel_slpc_active() returns 1 if slpc initialized (Paulo) change defau

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gen9: Add WaClearHIZ_WM_CHICKEN3 for bxt and glk

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gen9: Add WaClearHIZ_WM_CHICKEN3 for bxt and glk URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43024/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4164 -> Patchwork_8975 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External U

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 03/17] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Lay out SLPC init/enable/disable/fini helpers

2018-05-10 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:31:48 +0200, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: SLPC operates based on parameters setup in shared data between i915 and GuC SLPC. This is to be created/initialized in intel_guc_slpc_init. From there onwards i915 can control the SLPC operations by enabling, disabling complete SLPC

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9: Add WaClearHIZ_WM_CHICKEN3 for bxt and glk

2018-05-10 Thread Michel Thierry
Factor in clear values wherever required while updating destination min/max. References: HSDES#160184 Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry Cc: mesa-...@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Mika Kuoppala Cc: Oscar Mateo --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_workarou

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: scrub 64K

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/selftests: scrub 64K URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43023/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4164 -> Patchwork_8974 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External URL: https://patchwork.freed

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: scrub 64K

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Matthew Auld (2018-05-10 20:00:06) > We write out all PTEs when operating in 64K mode, which is acceptable > given the assertion that the hw only cares about every 16th PTE and so > will ignore everything else. However this may hide potential issues, > for example the hw could be sneakily

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: scrub 64K

2018-05-10 Thread Matthew Auld
We write out all PTEs when operating in 64K mode, which is acceptable given the assertion that the hw only cares about every 16th PTE and so will ignore everything else. However this may hide potential issues, for example the hw could be sneakily operating in 4K mode and we would be none the wiser

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submit onto idle engines

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 18:26:31) > > On 10/05/2018 17:25, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 17:09:14) > >> > >> On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> Bypass using the tasklet to submit the first request to HW, as the > >>> tasklet may be deferred unto

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submit onto idle engines

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 10/05/2018 17:25, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 17:09:14) On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Bypass using the tasklet to submit the first request to HW, as the tasklet may be deferred unto ksoftirqd and at a minimum will add in excess of 10us (and maybe tens

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Wrap tasklet_struct for abuse

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 10/05/2018 17:19, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 17:15:46) On 10/05/2018 17:03, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 16:49:03) On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: In the next few patches, we want to abuse tasklet to avoid ksoftirqd latency

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submit onto idle engines

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 17:09:14) > > On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Bypass using the tasklet to submit the first request to HW, as the > > tasklet may be deferred unto ksoftirqd and at a minimum will add in > > excess of 10us (and maybe tens of milliseconds) to our execut

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Wrap tasklet_struct for abuse

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 17:15:46) > > On 10/05/2018 17:03, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 16:49:03) > >> > >> On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> In the next few patches, we want to abuse tasklet to avoid ksoftirqd > >>> latency along critical path

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Wrap tasklet_struct for abuse

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 10/05/2018 17:03, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 16:49:03) On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: In the next few patches, we want to abuse tasklet to avoid ksoftirqd latency along critical paths. To make that abuse easily to swallow, first coat the tasklet in a l

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submit onto idle engines

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: Bypass using the tasklet to submit the first request to HW, as the tasklet may be deferred unto ksoftirqd and at a minimum will add in excess of 10us (and maybe tens of milliseconds) to our execution latency. This latency reduction is most notable when ex

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Wrap tasklet_struct for abuse

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-10 16:49:03) > > On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: > > In the next few patches, we want to abuse tasklet to avoid ksoftirqd > > latency along critical paths. To make that abuse easily to swallow, > > first coat the tasklet in a little syntactic sugar. > > >

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/guc: Don't store runtime GuC log level in modparam

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/guc: Don't store runtime GuC log level in modparam URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43013/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4163_full -> Patchwork_8973_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Wrap tasklet_struct for abuse

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 09/05/2018 15:27, Chris Wilson wrote: In the next few patches, we want to abuse tasklet to avoid ksoftirqd latency along critical paths. To make that abuse easily to swallow, first coat the tasklet in a little syntactic sugar. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin --- drivers/gp

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 04/14] drm/i915/gvt: Detect 64K gtt entry by IPS bit of PDE

2018-05-10 Thread Matthew Auld
On 8 May 2018 at 10:05, wrote: > From: Changbin Du > > This change help us detect the real entry type per PSE and IPS setting. > For 64K entry, we also need to check reg GEN8_GAMW_ECO_DEV_RW_IA. > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 68 > +

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc: Don't store runtime GuC log level in modparam

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/i915/guc: Don't store runtime GuC log level in modparam URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43013/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4163 -> Patchwork_8973 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Don't store runtime GuC log level in modparam

2018-05-10 Thread Piotr Piorkowski
From: Piotr Piórkowski Currently we are using modparam as placeholder for GuC log level. Stop doing this and keep runtime GuC level in intel_guc_log struct. Signed-off-by: Piotr Piórkowski Cc: Michal Wajdeczko Cc: Michał Winiarski Cc: Joonas Lahtinen Cc: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i9

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 10/14] drm/i915/kvmgt: Support setting dma map for huge pages

2018-05-10 Thread Matthew Auld
On 8 May 2018 at 10:05, wrote: > From: Changbin Du > > To support huge gtt, we need to support huge pages in kvmgt first. > This patch adds a 'size' param to the intel_gvt_mpt::dma_map_guest_page > API and implements it in kvmgt. > > v2: rebase. > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du > --- > drivers/g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] gpu: drm: i915: Change return type to vm_fault_t

2018-05-10 Thread Souptick Joarder
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Souptick Joarder wrote: > Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler. For > now, this is just documenting that the function returns > a VM_FAULT value rather than an errno. Once all instances > are converted, vm_fault_t will become a distinct type. > > Refer

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submission from irq handler

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-05-09 15:28:00) > Continuing the theme of bypassing ksoftirqd latency, also first try to > directly submit from the CS interrupt handler to clear the ELSP and > queue the next. > > In the past, we have been hesitant to do this as the context switch > processing has been

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_latency: New subtests for checking submission from RT tasks

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
From: Tvrtko Ursulin We want to make sure RT tasks which use a lot of CPU times can submit batch buffers with roughly the same latency (and certainly not worse) compared to normal tasks. v2: Add tests to run across all engines simultaneously to encourage ksoftirqd to kick in even more often. Si

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 7/9] trace.pl: Fix incomplete request handling

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Incomplete requests (no notify, no context complete) have to be corrected by looking at the engine timeline, and not the sorted-by-start-time view as was previously used. Per-engine timelines are generated on demand and cached for later use. v2: Find end of current context

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 6/9] trace.pl: Context save only applies to last request of a bunch

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Skip accounting the context save time for anything but the last request of the coalesced bunch, and also skip drawing those boxes on the timeline. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- scripts/trace.pl | 11 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --g

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 5/9] trace.pl: Skip drawing very short boxes

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Few micro-second long boxes cannot be displayed by the visualizer in a meaningful way so just burden the browser and the human looking at the noise. Sp skip drawing anything shorter and 10us. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- scripts/trace.pl | 15 ++- 1 file c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 8/9] trace.pl: Basic preemption support

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Just forget about earlier request_in events. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- scripts/trace.pl | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/trace.pl b/scripts/trace.pl index c795406ae785..92431974296a 100755 --- a/scripts/trace.pl +++ b/s

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 9/9] trace.pl: Fix request split mode

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Request split mode had several bugs, both in the original version and also after the recent refactorings. One big one was that it wasn't considering different submit ports as a reason to split execution, and also that it was too time based instead of looking at relevant time

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/9] trace.pl: Remove context squashing option

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Timeline id allocation order is not tied with engine ids any more. Remove the option which assumed that was the case in attempt to provide more readable timeline. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- scripts/media-bench.pl | 2 +- scripts/trace.pl | 18 ---

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/9] trace.pl: Add support for colouring context execution

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Add the command line switch which uses different colours for different context execution boxes. v2: * Use HSL to simplify color generation. (Lionel) * Colour other boxes in the same colour but different shade so it is easier to follow the timeline. Signed-off-by: Tvrtk

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/9] trace.pl: Fix engine busy accounting in split mode

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin In split mode all requests have to be added up since they were previously re-arranged so there is no overlap. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: John Harrison --- scripts/trace.pl | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/trace.pl b/scri

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/9] trace.pl: Improve readability of graphical timeline representation

2018-05-10 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin We add stripes for different stages of request execution so it is easier to follow one context in the multi-colour mode. Vertical stripe pattern indicates pipeline "blockages" - requests waiting for dependencies before they are runnable. Diagonal stripes indicate runnable r

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42990/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4163_full -> Patchwork_8971_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_8971_

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42988/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4163_full -> Patchwork_8970_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_897

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/dp: add module parameter for the dpcd access max retries (rev2)

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: drm/dp: add module parameter for the dpcd access max retries (rev2) URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42803/ State : failure == Summary == Applying: drm/dp: add module parameter for the dpcd access max retries error: corrupt patch at line 9 error: coul

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/gem_exec_latency: Report stddev for rthog

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Report and compare stddev instead of variance so that direct submission passes ;) --- tests/gem_exec_latency.c | 19 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_latency.c b/tests/gem_exec_latency.c index 547d728b3..757b390d0 100644 --- a/tests/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/i915: Add skl_check_nv12_surface for NV12

2018-05-10 Thread Srinivas, Vidya
> -Original Message- > From: Srinivas, Vidya > Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 5:08 PM > To: 'Maarten Lankhorst' ; 'intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org' > Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/i915: Add skl_check_nv12_surface for NV12 > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Srinivas, Vidy

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/dp: add module parameter for the dpcd access max retries

2018-05-10 Thread Feng Tang
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:28:15PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 09 May 2018, Feng Tang wrote: > > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:53:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Wed, 09 May 2018, Feng Tang wrote: > >> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 10:30:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 09 M

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-05-10 09:13:02) > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 89bf5d67cb74..d92857c879c1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42990/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4163 -> Patchwork_8971 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External URL: https://patchwork.f

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42990/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 4c164840dbb9 RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows -:19: ERROR:MISSING_SIGN_OFF: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s) total:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-05-10 08:47:31) > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > index 89bf5d67cb74..4c26e1fed6c6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c > +++ b/d

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42988/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4163 -> Patchwork_8970 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External URL: https://patchwork

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg: 2 tile rows

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 89bf5d67cb74..d92857c879c1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -1958,7 +

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb

2018-05-10 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/42988/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 36ebf10700bc RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb -:15: WARNING:MEMORY_BARRIER: memory barrier without comment #15

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFT gem_mmap_gtt/gdg Throw in a wmb

2018-05-10 Thread Chris Wilson
--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index 89bf5d67cb74..4c26e1fed6c6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -2089,6 +2089,7 @@ int i9