On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:31:44AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:38 PM, wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > > >
> > > > GPIO lookup tables are sup
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:49:50PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 20/04/16 13:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:00:09AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >>Op 19-04-16 om 12:13 schreef Lionel Landwerlin:
> >>>On 19/04/16 07:02, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 18-04-16 o
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 05:39:56PM -0400, Lyude wrote:
> If an MST device is disconnected while the machine is suspended, the
> number of connectors will change as well after we call
> intel_dp_mst_resume(). This means that any previous atomic state we had
> before suspending is no longer valid, si
> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 8:15 PM
> To: Kannan, Vandana
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Smith, Gary K
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Render decompression support for
> Gen9 and above
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 01:19 +0530, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:04:04PM +0530, sourab.gu...@intel.com wrote:
> > +static u64 get_current_gpu_ts(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > + return ((u64)I915_READ(GT_TIMESTAMP_COUNT_UDW) << 32) |
> > + I915_READ(GT
WW19 Regression report.
There was no new regressions last week.
Previous Regressions
+---+---+++
| BugId | Summary | Created on | Bisect |
+---+
Hi Dave,
Refcounting is hard, so here's a quick pull request with the one-liner to
fix up i915. Otherwise just a few other small things I picked up. Plus the
regression fix from Marten for rmfb behaviour that lingered around forever
since no testers. Feel free to cherry-pick that over to drm-fixes
Hi all,
New -testing cycle with cool stuff:
- refactor stolen quirks to share code between early quirks and i915 (Joonas)
- refactor gem BO/vma funcstion (Tvrtko&Dave)
- backlight over DPCD support (Yetunde Abedisi)
- more dsi panel sequence support (Jani)
- lots of refactoring around handling iom
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:25:18PM +0100, Yetunde Adebisi wrote:
> This patch adds support for eDP backlight control using DPCD registers to
> backlight hooks in intel_panel.
>
> It checks for backlight control over AUX channel capability and sets up
> function pointers to get and set the backligh
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:18:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:35:55PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > wrote:
> > > @@ -730,9 +730,14 @@ int i915_suspend_switcheroo(struct drm_device *dev,
> >
On May 08 Stefan Richter wrote:
> On May 06 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:45:31PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> [...]
> > > Subtest fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-fullscreen: FAIL (5.876s)
> >
> > This one failed in both runs. Can you please retest with just that using
> >
> >
On May 06 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:45:31PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
[...]
> > Subtest fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-fullscreen: FAIL (5.876s)
>
> This one failed in both runs. Can you please retest with just that using
>
> # kms_frontbuffer_tracking --run-subtest fbc-1p
On May 08 Stefan Richter wrote:
> On May 05 Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> > If you don't want to keep carrying a manual revert, you can just boot
> > with i915.enable_fbc=0 for now (or write a /etc/modprobe.d file). Also,
> > it would be good to know in case you still somehow see the machine
> > hangs e
On May 05 Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> If you don't want to keep carrying a manual revert, you can just boot
> with i915.enable_fbc=0 for now (or write a /etc/modprobe.d file). Also,
> it would be good to know in case you still somehow see the machine
> hangs even with FBC disabled.
As expected, i915.
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 09:35:55PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > @@ -730,9 +730,14 @@ int i915_suspend_switcheroo(struct drm_device *dev,
> > pm_message_t state)
> > static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_device *dev
Hi Matt,
On 22 April 2016 at 00:16, Matt Roper wrote:
> For a detailed explanation of this series, please see the original cover
> letter:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-April/091293.html
>
> This spin just incorporates the final review feedback from Maarten and
> hope
16 matches
Mail list logo
