On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 05:02:49PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2015-06-26 14:35 GMT-03:00 Chris Wilson :
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 07:35:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> We can't elide the fb tracking invalidate if the buffer is already in
> >> the right domain since that would lead to miss
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6596
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6633
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6587
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK -6
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6632
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK -1
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6586
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
[Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3 0/7] Crystalcove (CRC) PMIC based panel and pwm control]
On 26/06/2015 (Fri 20:47) Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:31:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:32:03PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Next update of the serie
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6578
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6575
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK -4
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6627
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6572
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6621
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6566
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6564
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6564
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6615
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK -8
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6562
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
In needs_ilk_vtd_wa(), we pass in the GPU device but compared it against
the ids for the mobile GPU and the mobile host bridge. That latter is
impossible and so likely was just a typo for the desktop GPU device id
(which is also buggy).
Fixes commit da88a5f7f7d434e2cde1b3e19d952e6d84533662
Author:
The existing GET_TILING ABI tells white lies. It tries to hide bit17
swizzling from userspace (because then swizzling depends upon the
physical address of the individual pages for an object). This of course
means that all swizzling to such objects is incorrect (at least half of
the time!). The GET_
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:19:26AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The old style of memory interleaving swizzled upto the end of the
> first even bank of memory, and then used the remainder as unswizzled on
> the unpaired bank - i.e. swizzling is not constant for all memory. This
> causes problems whe
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6611
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
We can forgo an evict-everything here as the shrinker operation itself
will unbind any vma as required. If we explicitly idle the GPU through a
switch to the default context, we not only create a request in an
illegal context (e.g. whilst shrinking during execbuf with a request
already allocated),
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6601
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
The old style of memory interleaving swizzled upto the end of the
first even bank of memory, and then used the remainder as unswizzled on
the unpaired bank - i.e. swizzling is not constant for all memory. This
causes problems when we try to migrate memory and so the kernel prevents
migration at all
24 matches
Mail list logo