On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 04:08:32PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:41:46AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Chris Wilson
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:53:48PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> Yeah that's kind the big behaviou
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:49:55PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> looks ok for me...
> you will also have conflict so a rebased version is at:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=review-drrs
>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
Merged up to this one, thanks for patches&review.
-Daniel
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:17:40PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> From: Vandana Kannan
>
> Calling enable/disable DRRS when enable/disable DDI are called.
> These functions are responsible for setup of drrs data (in enable) and
> reset of drrs (in disable).
> has_drrs is true when downclock_mode is
With Ville's rework to use drm_crtc_vblank_on/off the core will take
care of rejecting drm_vblank_get calls when the pipe is off. Also the
core won't call the get_vblank_counter hooks in that case either. And
since we've dropped ums support recently we can now remove these
hacks, yay!
Noticed whil
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:37:31PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Vetter
> > wrote:
> >> There's a race window (small for hpd, 10s large for polled outputs)
> >> where userspace could sneak in with an unrela
Any comments?
Regards,
Libin
> -Original Message-
> From: Yang, Libin
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:21 AM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Yang, Libin
> Subject: [PATCH] tools/intel_audio_dump: add details dump for
> Cherryview
>
> From: Libin Yang
>
> This patch add
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> There's a race window (small for hpd, 10s large for polled outputs)
>> where userspace could sneak in with an unrelated connnector probe
>> ioctl call and eat the hotplug event (since neit
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:04:26PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Replace all the vlv_gpu_freq(), vlv_freq_opcode(),
> *GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, and /GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER instances
> with intel_gpu_freq() and intel_freq_opcode() calls.
>
> Most of the ch
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:04:25PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Rename the vlv_gpu_freq() and vlv_freq_opecode() functions to have
> an intel_ prefix, and handle non-VLV/CHV platforms in them as well.
> Leave the vlv_ names around for now since they're cur
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:04:24PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Currently the 'gt_cur_freq_mhz' file shows the actual GPU frequency on
> VLV/CHV, and the last requested frequency on other platforms. Change the
> meaning of the file on VLV/CHV to follow the
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:04:23PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Currently we don't call valleyview_set_rps() when changing the min/max
> limits through sysfs if the current frequency is still within the new
> limits. However that means we sometimes forget
11 matches
Mail list logo