On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:32:41PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-07-2014 om 10:53 [+0200]:
> > On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A
> > > bisect result would be awesome.
>
> The
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:46:48AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> Added a property to enable user space to set aspect ratio.
> This patch contains declaration of the property and code to create the
> property.
>
> v2: Thierry's review comments.
> - Made aspect ratio enum generic instead of H
1) The design is by no means to disable boost and idle strategy. They are every
effective dealing with burst request, bring up the responsiveness.
2) The patch did disable part of gen6_set_rps_thresholds(), but gen6_set_rps
is supposed to function the same as before.
Would you point out the c
On 7/12/2014 3:29 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:31:59AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä
Sprite planes support 180 degree rotation. The lower layers are now in
place, so hook in the standard rotation property to expose the feature
to the users.
From: Dave Airlie
This reverts commit 38aecea0ccbb909d635619cba22f1891e589b434.
This breaks Haswell Thinkpad + Lenovo dock in SST mode with a HDMI monitor
attached.
Before this we can 1920x1200 mode, after this we only ever get 1024x768, and
a lot of deferring.
This didn't revert clean, but t
On 14 July 2014 10:46, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 15 May 2014 18:58, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 May 2014, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>>> We do have to continue the investigation on the link training side, but
>>> since 76711 is a critical I'm completely in favor of this workaround for
>>> now.
>>>
>
On 15 May 2014 18:58, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> We do have to continue the investigation on the link training side, but
>> since 76711 is a critical I'm completely in favor of this workaround for
>> now.
>>
>> I just tested and it worked very well here, so:
Paul Bolle schreef op wo 02-07-2014 om 10:53 [+0200]:
> On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > This does not ring any bells to me (but that doesn't prove anything). A
> > bisect result would be awesome.
The bisect (which took me quite some time) points at commit 98ec77397a5c
("d
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:16:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:48:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Chris Wilson
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 08:15:42PM +02
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:48:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Chris Wilson
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Chris Wilson
10 matches
Mail list logo