On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 01:53:47 +0200
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:48:13AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > Jesse,
> >
> > I was playing with a static analyzer and it flagged the following
> > code of yours.
> >
> > Is the val = 0 directly after the register read correct and int
Jesse,
I was playing with a static analyzer and it flagged the following
code of yours.
Is the val = 0 directly after the register read correct and intended?
commit 89b667f86a62a99a7b484a7e1b3f8f7a108a7dee
Author: Jesse Barnes
Date: Thu Apr 18 14:51:36 2013 -0700
drm/i915: update VLV PL
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:48:13AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Jesse,
>
> I was playing with a static analyzer and it flagged the following
> code of yours.
>
> Is the val = 0 directly after the register read correct and intended?
Also the same pattern is in other places, like vlv_pre_enable_d
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The current test for an attached enabled encoder fails if we have
> multiple connectors aliased to the same encoder - both connectors
> believe they own the enabled encoder and so we attempt to both enable
> and disable DPMS on the encoder, le
The current test for an attached enabled encoder fails if we have
multiple connectors aliased to the same encoder - both connectors
believe they own the enabled encoder and so we attempt to both enable
and disable DPMS on the encoder, leading to hilarity and an OOPs:
[ 354.803064] WARNING: CPU: 0
Let's CC some more people.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:17:34AM -0400, Wakko Warner wrote:
> Wakko Warner wrote:
> > Please keep me in CC.
> >
> > I receive a warning in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:3869. This
> > happens when I'm on a console, the screen has gone into power save and I
> >
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:58:39PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Let's CC some more people.
Please boot with drm.debug=0xe, reproduce the WARN and then attach the
full dmesg.
Thanks, Daniel
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:17:34AM -0400, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > Please