[Intel-gfx] IVB GPU turbo

2012-05-17 Thread Joe Bloggsian
Hi, We are looking at accelerating video operations using vaapi/intel-driver. When using Ivy bridge we believe that the GPU is (almost always) not turboing even when 100% busy doing vaapi video things (e.g. image scaling on EUs or bitstream decode). To determined this we use cat /sys/kernel/d

Re: [Intel-gfx] Specific resolution without monitor

2012-05-17 Thread Oliver Seitz
I'm using an ASUS Eeebox B202 so I don't have the option of adding a different video card. I'm not quite sure what you mean by modifying hardware but replacing the B202 defeats the purpose of trying to use it in the first place. Are you suggesting I avoid Intel graphics cards for this type of se

Re: [Intel-gfx] Specific resolution without monitor

2012-05-17 Thread Carl Hunter
On 5/17/2012 9:44 AM, Oliver Seitz wrote: Am 17.05.2012 15:36, schrieb Carl Hunter: On 5/17/2012 7:56 AM, The Fungi wrote: On 2012-05-17 07:22:38 +0200 (+0200), Oliver Seitz wrote: [...] But, if a monitor is connected but turned off, the monitor should be configured anyway. The EDID transmitti

Re: [Intel-gfx] Specific resolution without monitor

2012-05-17 Thread Oliver Seitz
Am 17.05.2012 15:36, schrieb Carl Hunter: On 5/17/2012 7:56 AM, The Fungi wrote: On 2012-05-17 07:22:38 +0200 (+0200), Oliver Seitz wrote: [...] But, if a monitor is connected but turned off, the monitor should be configured anyway. The EDID transmitting device inside the monitor is powered by

Re: [Intel-gfx] Specific resolution without monitor

2012-05-17 Thread Carl Hunter
On 5/17/2012 7:56 AM, The Fungi wrote: On 2012-05-17 07:22:38 +0200 (+0200), Oliver Seitz wrote: [...] But, if a monitor is connected but turned off, the monitor should be configured anyway. The EDID transmitting device inside the monitor is powered by the computer. [...] This is unfortunately

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: clarify semaphore-ring interaction

2012-05-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 16 May 2012 21:40:12 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > After Daniel split out this code, I think this makes more sense, and > looks nicer. Also added some comments to help the situation. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky The change is an improvement, just looks like it could be simplified... ;

Re: [Intel-gfx] Specific resolution without monitor

2012-05-17 Thread The Fungi
On 2012-05-17 07:22:38 +0200 (+0200), Oliver Seitz wrote: [...] > But, if a monitor is connected but turned off, the monitor should > be configured anyway. The EDID transmitting device inside the > monitor is powered by the computer. [...] This is unfortunately not always the case. For example, on