---
configure.ac |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 6a1d98e..538d0d8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
AC_PREREQ([2.63])
AC_INIT([libdrm],
-[2.4.33],
+[2.4.34],
[https
This patch adds a new function,
drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_set_aub_annotations(), which can be used to
annotate the type and subtype of data stored in various sections of
each buffer. This data is used to populate type and subtype fields
when generating the .aub file, which improves the ability of later
On Sun, 06 May 2012 23:51:26 -0700
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:58:59 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > I'm seeing about a 5% FPS improvement across various benchmarks on my
> > IVB i3. Rumor has it that the higher end parts show even more benefit.
> >
> > This derives from a patch
on 04/05/2012 00:33 Chris Wilson said the following:
> On Thu, 03 May 2012 17:23:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On 5/3/12 1:11 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> Can the problem be related to some 2048x2048 limitation in G33?
>>
>> Yes, the problem is exactly that limitation.
>
> Except that even U
Hi Alexander,
> One obvious difference is that Ubuntu and Fedora (who has a duplicate
> bug) use Plymouth, while Gentoo doesn't. To test the theory, could you
> please remove the "splash vt.handoff=7" parameters from the kernel
> command line?
Tried removing that still boots to a blank screen
Hi Dave,
As discussed on irc&mail, here's the pull request for the manual merge to
unconfuse git about the changes in intel_display.c. Note that I've
manually frobbed the shortlog to exclude all the changes merge through
Linus' tree.
Yours, Daniel
The following changes since commit 5bc69bf9aeb73
Hi Dave,
2 little patches:
- One regression fix to disable sdvo hotplug on broken hw.
- One patch to upconvert the snb hang workaround from patch v1 to patch
v2.
Yours, Daniel
The following changes since commit d48b97b403d23f6df0b990cee652bdf9a52337a3:
Linux 3.4-rc6 (2012-05-06 15:07:32 -07
On Fri, 4 May 2012 18:58:59 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> I'm seeing about a 5% FPS improvement across various benchmarks on my
> IVB i3. Rumor has it that the higher end parts show even more benefit.
>
> This derives from a patch originally given to me by Bernard. The docs
> are confusing about
