Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915: detect digital outputs on Haswell

2012-05-01 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 1 May 2012 08:01:08 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > I had wanted to avoid every HSW system looking like it had a bunch of > HDMI and DP ports, when it really only has one of each or something. Every DP port is also an HDMI port when a DP to HDMI converter is plugged in. -- keith.pack...@

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: l3 parity sysfs interface

2012-05-01 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Tue, 1 May 2012 20:24:44 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:40:21PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Dumb binary interfaces which allow root-only updates of the cache > > remapping registers. As mentioned in a previous patch, software using > > this interface needs to know a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: l3 parity sysfs interface

2012-05-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:40:21PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Dumb binary interfaces which allow root-only updates of the cache > remapping registers. As mentioned in a previous patch, software using > this interface needs to know about HW limits, and other programming > considerations as the ker

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: wait render timeout ioctl

2012-05-01 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Tue, 01 May 2012 10:19:53 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:41:08 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > This helps implement GL_ARB_sync put stops short of allowing full blow > "but"? "blown"? > > > sync objects. > > > > F

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Dynamic Parity Detection handling

2012-05-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:40:18PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On IVB hardware we are given an interrupt whenever a L3 parity error > occurs in the L3 cache. The L3 cache is used by internal GPU clients > only. This is a very rare occurrence (in fact to test this I need to > use specially instrum

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused dev_priv->vblank_pipe

2012-05-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 07:17:35PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > vblank_pipe was intended to be used for tracking DRI1 state. However, > the vblank_pipe reported to DRI1 is fixed to umask both pipes, and the > dev_priv->vblank_pipe unused and superfluous. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Queued for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove unused ring->irq_seqno

2012-05-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:17:03PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:00:03 +0100 > Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Only enable IPS polling for gen5

2012-05-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:58:27AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:35:02 +0100 > Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On SandyBridge IPS was entirely implemented in hardware and not reliant > > on the driver monitoring power consumption and feeding back desired run > > states, so the har

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/28] drm/i915: Avoid clearing preallocated regions from the GTT

2012-05-01 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 1 May 2012 19:30:10 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:47:42PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > + /* Clear any non-preallocated blocks */ > > + list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev_priv->mm.gtt_space.hole_stack, > > hole_stack) { > > + unsigned long hole_start

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: wait render timeout ioctl

2012-05-01 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:41:08 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > This helps implement GL_ARB_sync put stops short of allowing full blow "but"? "blown"? > sync objects. > > Finally we can use the new timed seqno waiting function to allow > user

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/28] drm/i915: Avoid clearing preallocated regions from the GTT

2012-05-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:47:42PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 32 +--- > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: time out of load detect busy-waits

2012-05-01 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:00:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:26:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:14:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:03:35 +0200, Daniel Vetter > > > wrote: > > > > If we try to do that and the sca

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/24] drm/i915: detect digital outputs on Haswell

2012-05-01 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:33:42 -0300 Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 21:27, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > We really really need to get the port detection working on HSW using > > the VBT. > > > > It is not that easy from what I've seen. VBT can give some hints on which > ports can sup

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Only enable IPS polling for gen5

2012-05-01 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:35:02 +0100 Chris Wilson wrote: > On SandyBridge IPS was entirely implemented in hardware and not reliant > on the driver monitoring power consumption and feeding back desired run > states, so the hardware is able to adapt quicker and more flexibly. Which > is a huge relief

[Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.19.0 [resend]

2012-05-01 Thread Chris Wilson
I sent this out over the weekend and never saw it arrive, so presuming the announcement was lost in transit... Release 2.19.0 (2012-04-29) === More stability fixes for UXA and support for another variant of IvyBridge. Given the severity of the stability fixes, I strongly re