On 01/20/2012 04:40 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:57:44 -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> On 01/20/2012 11:16 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:59:57 -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On 01/19/2012 10:54 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:50:05 -0800
> Hi all,
>
> Not much in the first -next update under the new process, I'd like to
> tests the qa process first. Highligths:
> - first part of i9xx_crtc_mode_set refactor from Jesse
> - quite a few ajax-is-paranoid patches
> - HAS_LLC param from Eugeni
> - kill i915_mem.c
>
> For easier testing
Original message
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Remove the MI_FLUSH_ENABLE
setting.
From: Eric Anholt
To: Ben Widawsky
CC: Keith Packard ,intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:57:44 -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 11:16 AM, Er
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:57:44 -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 11:16 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:59:57 -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> >> On 01/19/2012 10:54 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:50:05 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >>>
> -
On Friday, January 20, 2012 11:51 AM, Eric Anholt [mailto:e...@anholt.net]
wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Does anyone have any thoughts on moving a lot of the 2D acceleration
> > out of the X driver and into libdrm, this way it can be used by non-X
> > drivers?
>
> The goal is not to move it out, it's to d
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 21:10, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> Does anyone have any thoughts on moving a lot of the 2D acceleration
> >> out of the X driver and into libdrm, this way it can be used by non-X
> >> drivers?
> >
> > The goal is not to move it out, it's to delete it and just use G
Hi,
>> Does anyone have any thoughts on moving a lot of the 2D acceleration
>> out of the X driver and into libdrm, this way it can be used by non-X
>> drivers?
>
> The goal is not to move it out, it's to delete it and just use GL.
Now that SNA is finally almost stable and really fast, revert
eve
On 01/20/2012 11:16 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:59:57 -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> On 01/19/2012 10:54 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
>>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:50:05 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>>
- if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev))
- mode |= MI_
The Imprudence Secondlife Viewer complains about the graphix capabilities,
too...
but: later it just does reflections/water/shininess right (no disabled graphix
features like in the official SL viewer)...
but:
1. Imprudence produces just 15fps with all CPUs <50%... and intel_gpu_top
showing noth
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:00:45 -0800 (PST), AW wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I use Fedora Core 16 on an Intel Core i7-2600K...
> Intel says, that HD Graphics 3000 can do OpenGL 3.0 (Wikipedia even says 3.1),
> but: SecondLife complains about insufficient graphix support...
> It refuses to do "Bump mapping and s
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:46:59 +, "Stead, Alan" wrote:
> Hello,
> Does anyone have any thoughts on moving a lot of the 2D acceleration
> out of the X driver and into libdrm, this way it can be used by non-X
> drivers?
The goal is not to move it out, it's to delete it and just use GL.
pgpL9BTO
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:43:44 +0100, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> I've reviewed gen2 pageflip code do hunt down multple prepare pageflip
> issues. The only thing I've found is a slight but functionally
> meaningless confusion about the length of the mi cmd.
>
> Fix it up and add a comment about what th
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:59:57 -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On 01/19/2012 10:54 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:50:05 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> >> - if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev))
> >> - mode |= MI_FLUSH_ENABLE << 16 | MI_FLUSH_ENABLE;
> >
>
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:35:07 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The last patch to revert the busy-loop w/a from Eric is missing your sob
> line. You can also add Acked-by: Daniel Vetter to
> it if you want.
Thanks! I've updated the drm-intel-fixes branch.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp2F8XhUx6no
Hi!
I use Fedora Core 16 on an Intel Core i7-2600K...
Intel says, that HD Graphics 3000 can do OpenGL 3.0 (Wikipedia even says 3.1),
but: SecondLife complains about insufficient graphix support...
It refuses to do "Bump mapping and shiny", "Basic shaders",
"Atmospheric shaders", "Lighting and Shad
Hello,
Does anyone have any thoughts on moving a lot of the 2D acceleration out of the
X driver and into libdrm, this way it can be used by non-X drivers?
Thanks
Alan Stead
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedeskt
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:55:15PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:39:40 -0200
> Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > 2012/1/18 Peter Ross :
> > > This patch set enables enables interlaced mode output on
> > > generation 3 and above chipsets.
> >
> > I just tested that on HD
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:30:24AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:24:26AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:16:02AM +0100, CC wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:18:17PM +010
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:24:26AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:16:02AM +0100, CC wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:18:17PM +0100, CC wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I've heard that you need users h
Hi all,
Not much in the first -next update under the new process, I'd like to
tests the qa process first. Highligths:
- first part of i9xx_crtc_mode_set refactor from Jesse
- quite a few ajax-is-paranoid patches
- HAS_LLC param from Eugeni
- kill i915_mem.c
For easier testing there's also an upda
I've reviewed gen2 pageflip code do hunt down multple prepare pageflip
issues. The only thing I've found is a slight but functionally
meaningless confusion about the length of the mi cmd.
Fix it up and add a comment about what this dword should be (according
to docs at least).
Signed-Off-by: Dani
On 19 Jan 2012, at 17:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:22:56PM +, Glen Gray wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Jan 2012, at 12:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:27:49PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:04:43 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:22:08PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> I've merged all of the patches for the forcewake work-around for IVB irq
> issues to the drm-intel-fixes branch, along with a handful of other
> pending fixes. I plan to send this upstream after it has seen suitable
> testing, so p
23 matches
Mail list logo
