[Intel-gfx] Intel graphics control center?

2011-12-16 Thread Magnus Uppman
Hello! Is there any chance of a "Intel-Settings" application like "Nvidia-Settings" or the "AMD Control Center"? It would for example be VERY useful to be able to compensate for overscan when connecting to a stupid TV.. Best regards, Magnus Uppman ___

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: fix infinite recursion on unbind due to ilk vt-d w/a"

2011-12-16 Thread Keith Packard
This reverts commit eb1711bb94991e93669c5a1b5f84f11be2d51ea1. This patch has been reported by two people to cause memory corruption and application crashes. It exists solely to fix a problem with the VT-d workarounds for Ironlake. I would back those out as well as without this change, that work-ar

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/43] drm/i915: Only clear the GPU domains upon a successful finish

2011-12-16 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:57:23 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > From: Chris Wilson > > By clearing the GPU read domains before waiting upon the buffer, we run > the risk of the wait being interrupted and the domains prematurely > cleared. The next time we attempt to wait upon the buffer (after > use

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes (drm/i915 driver)

2011-12-16 Thread Keith Packard
A few regression fixes: * eDP panels with too few lanes need 6bpc modes * older machine backlights going black * divide-by-zero crash when reading a /sys file Quirks for a couple of machines: * No lvds panel on a desktop ASUS machine * Light up the second LVDS on the Libretto W105 Two mor

Re: [Intel-gfx] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem

2011-12-16 Thread Keith Packard
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:38:39 +0100, tino.keitel+x...@tikei.de wrote: > Hum, could this be related to the RC6 vs. IOMMU issue? I have > CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU enabled in 3.2, and disabled in 3.1, and boot with > i915.i915_enable_rc6=1. Very likely -- RC6 and semaphores are not compatible with IOMMU. Y

Re: [Intel-gfx] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem

2011-12-16 Thread tino . keitel+xorg
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:54:15 +0100, tino.keitel+x...@tikei.de wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 20:57:51 +0100, tino.keitel+x...@tikei.de wrote: > > [...] > > > it looks I stumbled over the same: > > > > [88399.844150] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1952! > > 2011-12-14_19:28:5

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/testdisplay.c: make the 3th pipe finish all the mode setting.

2011-12-16 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 08:57, Yi Sun wrote: > If test all modes rather than preferred mode, remove framebuffer and set > CRTC to zero after each connector mode setting. > > Signed-off-by: Sun Yi > I forgot to comment on this before, but better late than never. Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov --

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] uxa/glamor: Fallback to new glamor pixmap if failed to create textured pixmap.

2011-12-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:31:20 +0800, "Zhigang Gong" wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 5:21 PM > > To: zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com > > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; zhigang.g...@gmail.com; Zhiga

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] uxa/glamor: Fallback to new glamor pixmap if failed to create textured pixmap.

2011-12-16 Thread Zhigang Gong
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 5:21 PM > To: zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; zhigang.g...@gmail.com; Zhigang > Gong > Subject: Re: [PATCH] uxa/glamor: Fallback to new glamor pi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] uxa/glamor: Fallback to new glamor pixmap if failed to create textured pixmap.

2011-12-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:39:55 +0800, zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote: > +fallback_glamor: > + /* Create textured pixmap failed means glamor failed to > + * create a texture from current BO for some reasons. We turn > + * to create a new glamor pixmap and clean up current one. > +

Re: [Intel-gfx] One regression in UXA

2011-12-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:08:57 +0800, "Zhigang Gong" wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > > I tested a browser case with latest UXA code and experienced X crashed. > > I bisected it and found that it was introduced by > > commit 5d5b2b8ee203ae2274fc7d13ed38d2945facca9e. [snip] > It's a one line patch

Re: [Intel-gfx] One regression in UXA

2011-12-16 Thread Zhigang Gong
Forgot to mention that to access that link need to be in Intel intranet environment. From: intel-gfx-bounces+zhigang.gong=linux.intel@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces+zhigang.gong=linux.intel@lists.freedesktop.org ] On Behalf Of Zhigang Gong Sent: Friday, December 16, 201

[Intel-gfx] One regression in UXA

2011-12-16 Thread Zhigang Gong
Hi Chris, I tested a browser case with latest UXA code and experienced X crashed. I bisected it and found that it was introduced by commit 5d5b2b8ee203ae2274fc7d13ed38d2945facca9e. The back trace of the crash is as below: Backtrace: 0: /home/gongzg/gfx-dev-test/src/xserver/hw/xfree